Guyana: Extradition Case Against Nazar, Azruddin Mohamed Adjourned After Late Prosecution Disclosure

News Americas, GEORGETOWN, Guyana, Thurs. Jan. 8, 2025: Extradition proceedings involving businessman Nazar Mohamed and his son, Guyana’s presumed opposition leader, Azruddin Mohamed of the WIN Party, were adjourned on Thursday after the prosecution introduced a document that had not been previously reviewed by the defence.

Nasar Mohammed, l. and WIN Party leader, Azruddin Mohamed, r.

Presiding Magistrate Judy Latchman made it clear that the court would not tolerate unnecessary delays, stating pointedly, “This is not a game of chess; there will be no jumping,” as she emphasized the need for the matter to proceed efficiently.

During the hearing, lead prosecutor Terrence Williams informed the court that the prosecution was disclosing a statement from Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Minister Hugh Todd, which he said formed part of the state’s case.

Defence attorneys objected to the late disclosure, arguing that they had not been given sufficient time to review the new material or obtain instructions from their clients. They told the court that the statement was reportedly emailed by Glenn Hanoman on Wednesday, January 8, at approximately 1:00 p.m., and requested that the extradition proceedings either be halted or adjourned.

In response, Williams assured the court that no further documents were anticipated beyond those already disclosed, adding that the prosecution would comply with its duty to disclose should any new material arise.

Magistrate Latchman, however, ruled that the court would not permit any additional disclosures going forward. She acknowledged, nevertheless, that the defence must be afforded adequate time to consider the newly introduced document before the case proceeds.

As a result, the extradition matter has been adjourned and is scheduled to resume on February 5, 2026.

The extradition proceedings stem from a request by United States authorities and are being conducted under Guyana’s Fugitive Offenders Act, with both Nazar and Azruddin Mohamed currently on bail pending the outcome of the committal hearing.

U.S. Withdraws From International Organizations Including In The Caribbean and Latin American

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Jan. 8, 2026: In a sweeping move that marks a significant shift in U.S. engagement with multilateral institutions, the US withdraws from international organizations, conventions, and treaties – including several focused on the Caribbean and Latin America — saying continued participation no longer serves American interests.

Donald Trump withdraws from several global organizations as protests globally denounce the US attack on Venezuela and the seizure of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, including front of the US embassy in Seoul on January 5, 2026. (Photo by Jung Yeon-je / AFP via Getty Images)

Announced in a presidential memorandum dated Jan. 7, 2026, the US President directed all U.S. executive agencies to immediately begin the process of exiting the listed bodies, which the administration says operate “contrary to the interests of the United States.”

The decision follows a year-long review of U.S. memberships in international organizations and treaties that began under Executive Order 14199 in 2025. Agencies were tasked with assessing whether continued involvement advances national security, economic priorities, or U.S. sovereignty.

Regional Entities Affected

Among the entities on the withdrawal list is the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) – Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), a key forum for regional economic cooperation and research.

ECLAC, which brings together governments across Latin America and the Caribbean to promote sustainable development, data-sharing and economic policy coordination, has historically served as a platform for addressing issues ranging from trade and infrastructure to poverty reduction — areas closely tied to Caribbean and Latin American interests.

In another blow to regional cooperation frameworks, the U.S. also plans to pull out of the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, a body dedicated to scientific and cultural research in the Western Hemisphere.

The US also pulled out of the Permanent Forum on the Global Forum on Migration and Development; People of African Descent; Office of the Special Adviser on Africa; the  International Trade Centre and UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) — Economic Commission for Africa.

These withdrawals underscore the Trump administration’s broader repositioning on international engagement. Officials maintain that these organizations often focus on “globalist” agendas and climate, labor, or social policies that they believe conflict with U.S. priorities. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has framed the exits as an effort to protect U.S. sovereignty and ensure taxpayer dollars are spent where they best benefit American citizens.

Controversial Pullbacks From Old Allies

The move expands on a trend of disengagement from global institutions in recent years, including the U.S. exit from the World Health Organization, UNESCO, the U.N. Human Rights Council and the formal withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement in past administrations.

Among other major bodies the U.S. is leaving are:

U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the backbone of global climate action

U.N. Population Fund (UNFPA)

Global Counterterrorism Forum

International Renewable Energy Agency

Global Forum on Migration and Development
— though the administration said it may continue to cooperate “where interests align.”

Reactions and Regional Implications

Critics — including human rights advocates, climate experts, and foreign policy scholars — say the withdrawal could weaken U.S. influence in the hemisphere, isolate partners on issues like disaster response or migration, and cede ground to nations like China that continue robust engagement with regional institutions.

For Caribbean and Latin American nations, the change raises questions about future cooperation in economic planning, trade forums, climate adaptation efforts, and data-driven policy development — especially at a time when many in the region are grappling with climate vulnerability, economic recovery, and migration challenges.

What’s Next

The memorandum instructs departments to begin implementing the withdrawals “as soon as possible,” though legal and procedural timelines vary by organization. For United Nations bodies, U.S. participation and funding will phase out according to treaty obligations and applicable law.

Observers say this represents a notable recalibration of U.S. foreign policy that could reshape diplomatic and development engagement across the Caribbean and Latin America in 2026 and beyond.

RELATED: What The U.S.’ 2025 Narco Report Said About Drug Trafficking In The Caribbean

The Top 10 Caribbean Passports For 2026

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Jan. 8, 2026: As global mobility becomes a strategic asset for investors, business leaders, and internationally mobile professionals, some Caribbean passports remain standout performers – offering a mix of travel access, tax efficiency, dual citizenship options, and personal freedom. The 2026 Nomad Passport Index (NPI), released this week by global citizenship consultancy Nomad Capitalist, ranks 199 citizenships using five weighted factors that go beyond visa-free travel to include taxation, global perception, dual citizenship acceptance and personal freedom.

While European and Middle Eastern jurisdictions dominate the global top 10 globally, with Malta in first place, followed by Greece, Ireland, and Romania near the top — several Caribbean nations continue to represent valuable passport options for those seeking international flexibility and economic opportunity.

Top 10 Caribbean Passport Rankings (2026)

Nomad Capitalist does not publish a dedicated Caribbean subset, but based on their overall 199-country index and broader passport strength data, Caribbean passports typically score solidly when evaluated alongside global benchmarks. Here’s the approximate ranking of Caribbean passports based on their relative strengths within the index and other global passport indices:

Caribbean PassportGlobal Mobility Rank (Visa-free) – Nomad CapitalistBarbados1st regionally (45th globally)St. Kitts and Nevis2nd (50th globally)Bahamas3rd (52nd globally)Saint Vincent & Grenadines4th (55th globally)Trinidad & Tobago4th (58th globally)Antigua & Barbuda5th (60th)Grenada6th (62nd globally)Saint Lucia7th (64th globally)Dominica8th (69th globally)Belize and Jamaica9th (101st globally)Guyana 10th (104th globally)

Caribbean passports have never featured in the global top 10 but their relative strength globally remains notable because:

Caribbean nations do not tax citizens on worldwide income, unlike the U.S., boosting tax efficiency scores.

Many Caribbean islands permit dual citizenship, making them attractive for global citizens.

Several, such as St. Kitts & Nevis, Dominica, Antigua & Barbuda and Grenada, offer Citizenship-By-Investment, (CBI), programs that rank well in investor criteria.

Why Caribbean Passports Matter More Than Ever

As geopolitical uncertainty grows, passports from small but strategic nations — especially Caribbean states with established CBI programs — offer more than travel perks. They are tools for wealth protection, lifestyle diversification, and global business access, particularly for entrepreneurs and investors seeking options beyond traditional Western powers.

The Caribbean’s growing role in the global mobility landscape reflects its synergy of tax-friendly citizenship frameworks, visa flexibility, and strong diaspora networks, making its passports a valuable consideration in the modern era of global citizenship planning.

Over the last 10 years, Anglo-Saxon giants like the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia never broke into the elite tier, remaining above average but failing to finish in the top five. The U.S. is currently stuck in 43rd under the weight of citizenship‑based taxation, while the U.K. has slipped to 35th as its non‑domicile regime has disappeared.

Investors and entrepreneurs are more likely to consider the United Arab Emirates and core European Union passports – headlined by Malta this year. The decade ends with a clear “barbell” strategy, as global citizens pair blue‑chip lifestyle passports with one or more efficiency passports or residencies, rather than chasing a single perfect passport.

The NPI was designed to educate aspiring global citizens about the true value of the world’s citizenships. While most indices – and most people – think of a passport only in terms of travel privileges, Nomad Capitalist recognizes that citizens of different countries deal with various requirements to pay taxes, comply with regulations, live freely, and avoid scrutiny when traveling. The NPI speaks to those seeking personal freedom and financial prosperity in a changing world by more deeply analyzing the true value of each passport.

Founded by Andrew Henderson, the original “Nomad Capitalist,” the boutique consulting firm supports over 150 high- and ultra-high-net-worth individuals each year, primarily from the United States. Since 2012, Nomad Capitalist has guided more than 1,500 clients – including numerous celebrities – from over 100 countries in obtaining second passports and citizenships, strategically relocating and building offshore wealth, and exploring pathways to legally reduce their tax burdens. 

“Over the last decade, the Nomad Passport Index has empowered the world’s entrepreneurs and investors with the best possible information, so they can find the best possible passports for global citizenship,” said Khatia Gelbakhiani, Chief Growth Officer at Nomad Capitalist. “In 2026, Malta catapulted to the top of the list because of its favorable tax climate, dual citizenship offerings, and robust civil liberties. Year after year, it has become clear that Western countries like the United States and the United Kingdom are lagging behind, as global citizens pursue the barbell strategy and weigh a wide range of attractive alternatives like Malta. Our research shows that holding multiple citizenships and residencies is no longer a luxury; it is a necessity for success in the modern world. The most successful global citizens will go where they are treated best, and Nomad Capitalist will continue to support them every step of the way.”

RELATED: Best Caribbean Passports – 2025

What The U.S.’ 2025 Narco Report Said About Drug Trafficking In The Caribbean

News Americas, NY, NY: The United States has killed more than 115 people in boats across the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean by blowing up vessels it identified as carrying drug traffickers. This comes as the United States’ 2025 Narco Report – International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, (INCSR), identified the Caribbean as a central transshipment corridor for drug trafficking in the movement of cocaine from Venezuela to North America – underscoring the region’s growing strategic importance in global narcotics trafficking networks.

A US Air Force F22-Raptor takes off from José Aponte de la Torre Airport, formerly Roosevelt Roads Naval Station, in Ceiba, Puerto Rico, on January 4, 2026. US President Donald Trump threatened Sunday that Venezuela’s new leader will pay a “big price” if she does not cooperate with the United States, after US forces seized and jailed her former boss Nicolas Maduro. If interim president Delcy Rodriguez “doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro,” Trump told The Atlantic in a telephone interview. (Photo by Miguel J. Rodriguez Carrillo / AFP via Getty Images)

According to the report, cocaine shipments originating in Colombia and Venezuela are routinely moved through Caribbean airspace and territorial waters using go-fast boats, fishing vessels, container ships, and clandestine aircraft before reaching the United States or onward markets in Europe. The Bahamas, Belize, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica were all named as major illicit drug producing and/or drug-transit countries in the Caribbean.

The INCSR warned that trafficking through the Caribbean is sustained not only by geography, but by systemic corruption and weak institutional controls in key transit zones. Traffickers, the report states, often rely on local political protection, compromised security services, and limited enforcement capacity to move drugs with minimal interference.

Of particular relevance amid heightened regional political scrutiny, the report notes that corruption linked to narcotics trafficking frequently extends into political structures along major trafficking routes. While the report does not name Caribbean officials, it explicitly states that cocaine traffickers pay politicians and officials for protection from arrest and operational freedom – allowing drugs to transit the region with impunity.

The Caribbean’s role is described as logistical rather than production-based, but no less critical. Traffickers use the region for storage, repackaging, refueling, and redistribution, increasing cocaine’s value at each stage before it reaches U.S. markets, where demand and prices are highest.

“The Dominican Republic (DR) serves as a transit point for South American cocaine moving through the Caribbean to the United States and Europe,” the report said. “Traffickers rely on direct maritime routes from the Venezuelan and Colombian coasts, using “go-fast” boats to reach remote areas off the DR’s southern coast.”

Additionally, the US report said “D”drug trafficking in the six island nations of the Dutch Caribbean varies in scope.”

“However, the overall area remains significant due to its location as an international drug transshipment point,” the report added.

“Sint Maarten is in the Eastern Caribbean and is a transshipment hub for cocaine and marijuana transiting onward to Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Europe,” the 2025 report stated. “Cocaine and marijuana are primarily transported via different maritime vessels for transshipment to the U.S., other Caribbean islands, Africa, and Europe. In addition, traffickers routinely stage smaller airplanes on the islands for drug runs to Venezuela and Colombia.”

The US said that drugs, “after traveling to cocaine production countries, the aircraft normally fly onward to Central America, Guyana, Suriname, or other Caribbean destinations including the U.S. Virgin Islands and The Bahamas.”

“In addition, all major islands reported maritime vessels of varying sizes involved in the smuggling of narcotics originating from Venezuela with ultimate destination to the United States or Europe,” the report’s authors said. “This open cooperation ultimately allows the United States to deploy enforcement resources more effectively throughout the region to prevent the flow of drugs into the United States.”

On Haiti, the report said “Haiti remains a transit point for cocaine from South American and marijuana from Jamaica en route to the United States,” but noted that “lLocal drug production is minimal, primarily consisting of cannabis cultivation for domestic consumption.”

Focusing on Jamaica, the report said “Jamaica is both a significant producer of illicit drugs and a key transit country for narcotics destined for North America and Europe.”

“Jamaica is the Caribbean’s largest producer of cannabis, which is cultivated in its expansive rural areas,” the report said. “The country is strategically located for cocaine transshipment between South America, especially Colombia, and the United States. Jamaican criminal networks are often linked to transnational organized crime and facilitate drug trafficking via air and maritime routes. Marijuana is widely consumed in Jamaica and the use of psychoactive drugs, such as MDMA, is increasing. Psilocybin is largely unregulated, and a growing commercial industry promotes its use.”

The report also highlighted growing security risks associated with trafficking, including the spillover of organized crime, firearms, money laundering, and gang activity into Caribbean societies. These pressures strain already limited law-enforcement resources and threaten economic stability – particularly in tourism-dependent states.

In addition, the INCSR pointed to increasing use of maritime routes across the southern and eastern Caribbean, including areas bordering Venezuela, Guyana, and Suriname. These routes are often harder to monitor and exploit gaps in radar coverage, aerial surveillance, and coast-guard capacity.

While some Caribbean governments cooperate closely with U.S. and regional partners, the report emphasized that uneven enforcement and political sensitivity continue to undermine collective responses. Traffickers, it notes, adapt quickly, rerouting shipments through jurisdictions perceived as less vigilant.

The findings arrive at a moment of intensified regional attention following U.S. indictments tied to Venezuela’s leadership. Those charges have fueled public debate and speculation across the Caribbean and the Diaspora about political exposure along trafficking routes referenced- but not named – in U.S. court filings.

The indictment alleges that politicians operating along what prosecutors describe as a “Caribbean route” were corrupted by cocaine traffickers, accepting payments in exchange for protection from arrest and allowing favored traffickers to operate with impunity as cocaine moved north from Venezuela toward the United States.

While no Caribbean officials are named in the documents, the reference has sparked widespread discussion on social media and in political circles across the region.

Ultimately, the INCSR calls for stronger regional coordination, intelligence-sharing, and institutional reform, warning that without sustained action, the Caribbean risks becoming further entrenched as a strategic bridge in the global cocaine trade.

As U.S. enforcement and scrutiny intensify, the report makes clear that the Caribbean’s role – whether through vulnerability, governance gaps, or corruption – remains central to the hemisphere’s narcotics challenge.

RELATED: Speculation Rife Over Identity Of Caribbean Politicians Named in U.S. Maduro Indictment

Lifetime Achievement Honors For Mr. Vegas, Sly Dunbar and Leroy Sibbles At Reggae Genealogy

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Weds. Jan. 7, 2025: Three pillars of Jamaican music – Mr. Vegas, Sly Dunbar and Leroy Sibbles – will receive Lifetime Achievement Awards at Reggae Genealogy® 2026, presented by Island SPACE Caribbean Museum, on Saturday, February 7, in Plantation, Florida.

Island SPACE Caribbean Museum celebrates reggae legends with Lifetime Achievement Awards during its high-impact, multimedia kickoff to Reggae Month on February 7

The annual event, which officially kicks off Reggae Month in South Florida, returns with its most ambitious production to date under the theme “Lights. Camera. Reggae.” Organizers expect more than 3,000 attendees for the large-scale outdoor showcase at Volunteer Park, celebrating reggae’s enduring influence across music, film, television and global pop culture.

The 2026 edition blends live performance, visual storytelling and cultural dialogue, spotlighting reggae’s evolution from Jamaica to the world. The festival is supported by the City of Plantation, Broward County Cultural Division, Florida Power & Light, Grace Foods, and Inner Circle/Bigg Zound.

Three Icons, One Legacy Moment

Mr. Vegas, one of dancehall’s most globally recognized voices, broke through internationally in the late 1990s with hits including “Heads High” and “Nike Air.” Known for his high-energy performances and genre-blending catalog, the MOBO Award winner has maintained chart presence and worldwide touring appeal for nearly three decades.

Sly Dunbar, the legendary drummer and producer behind Sly & Robbie, is among the most influential figures in reggae history. With credits spanning Bob Marley, Junior Murvin, Grace Jones and beyond, Dunbar’s innovations helped define reggae, rocksteady and dancehall rhythms. He is a two-time Grammy Award winner and one of the most recorded drummers in the genre.

Leroy Sibbles, lead singer and bassist of The Heptones, was instrumental in shaping the sound of Studio One during reggae’s formative years. In addition to voicing classics like “Book of Rules” and “Party Time,” Sibbles created foundational basslines that became enduring riddims, influencing generations of artists and producers.

Performance-Driven Celebration

The event opens with a tribute to reggae and film icon Jimmy Cliff, followed by performances from Tifa, Phil Watkis, Roy G and Bobby Rose, backed by Code Red Band. Jamaican actress Audrey Reid (Dancehall Queen) will host the main stage, with music by Bigg G and DJ King Mega and pre-show hosting by Frank!e Red.

Additional programming includes a fireside chat with Leroy Sibbles, Caribbean food vendors, artisan marketplaces, a children’s activity zone and a corporate networking circle.

Gates open at 4 p.m., with the main program beginning at 6 p.m. Tickets are on sale at reggaegenealogy.org/tickets, priced at $30 for general admission, $80 for VIP, and $10 for children.

Extradition Case Against Azruddin Mohamed, Dad Advances Despite Defense Appeal

News Americas, Georgetown, Guyana, Jan. 6, 2026: Extradition proceedings against Guyanese businessman Nazar Mohamed and his son, political leader of the WIN party and presumed Guyana opposition leader, Azruddin Mohamed, advanced on today after a Georgetown magistrate declined to suspend the matter, despite the defence filing an appeal to the Full Court.

Presiding at the Georgetown Magistrates’ Courts, Principal Magistrate Judy Latchman ruled that there was no legal basis to pause the committal proceedings, noting that no stay had been granted by a superior court. She subsequently directed the prosecution to begin presenting its case.

Earlier in the proceedings, defence attorneys served the court with a Notice of Appeal challenging a recent High Court ruling by Acting Chief Justice Navindra Singh, which refused an application to halt the extradition process. The defence argued that the magistrate’s court proceedings should be suspended pending the determination of constitutional issues raised in their challenge to Guyana’s extradition framework.

Magistrate Latchman, however, maintained that until a stay is formally ordered by the Full Court or another superior tribunal, the committal hearing must continue. In the absence of such an order, she ruled, the court was legally obliged to proceed.

As the case moves into the evidentiary phase, the prosecution is expected to call its first witness, Sharon Roopchand, Permanent Secretary at Guyana’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The ruling followed submissions from the prosecution, led by King’s Counsel Terrence Williams, who argued that the mere filing of an appeal does not automatically suspend ongoing extradition proceedings. The magistrate accepted that position.

The extradition request was initiated by United States authorities, who are seeking the surrender of Nazar and Azruddin Mohamed in connection with federal criminal charges filed in the Southern District of Florida. The allegations relate to purported financial crimes linked to gold exports, including fraud and money laundering offences.

The matter is being heard under Guyana’s Fugitive Offenders Act and an existing extradition treaty between Guyana and the United States. Since late 2025, the defence has pursued multiple legal avenues aimed at delaying or stopping the extradition process, including constitutional litigation.

On Monday, Acting Chief Justice Singh dismissed the application for a stay, clearing the way for proceedings to continue in the magistrates’ court. Although the defence has since appealed that ruling, no order has been issued suspending the extradition hearing.

Both Nazar and Azruddin Mohamed remain on bail, subject to court-imposed conditions, as the committal proceedings continue.

RELATED: Guyana High Court Rejects Bid To Halt Extradition Proceedings Against Nazar And Azruddin

Venezuela’s Crisis Is A Warning: When Ideology Replaces Governance, Nations Fail

By Keith Bernard

News Americas, NY, NY: Venezuela stands as the clearest warning of what happens when ideology replaces governance. Caught between neoconservative interventionism and neo-Bolivarian defiance, the country has become less a sovereign state than an ideological battlefield – one its people did not choose.

Hundreds of protesters turned out at the Hands Off Venezuela demonstration in response to the United States of America’s actions in Venezuela on the 5th of January 2026, London, United Kingdom. The US attacked Venezuela on the 3rd of January and captured President Maduro and his wife Celia Flores in a highly controversial military action, which critics have suggested is illegal and in breach of international conventions. (photo by Kristian Buus/In Pictures via Getty Images)

Neoconservatism, as reflected in U.S. policy toward Venezuela, rests on the belief that economic pressure and diplomatic isolation can force democratic change. Years of sanctions and international pressure, however, have failed to dislodge the ruling elite. Instead, they have deepened economic collapse, fueled mass migration, and hardened authoritarian rule. Leverage became punishment, with ordinary Venezuelans paying the price.

The neo-Bolivarian movement, born under Hugo Chávez and sustained by Nicolás Maduro, presented itself as an anti-imperial alternative—one promising sovereignty, equality, and social justice. In practice, it centralized power, dismantled institutions, and reduced accountability. Oil wealth masked mismanagement until it vanished, leaving scarcity, corruption, and repression in its wake. Revolutionary rhetoric became a substitute for policy.

Venezuela exposes the shared flaw of both doctrines. Neo-conservatism assumes coercion produces reform. Neo-Bolivarianism assumes ideology can replace institutions. Both are wrong.

The fallout is regional. Millions of Venezuelans have fled, straining neighbors across Latin America and the Caribbean. Trade has suffered, diplomacy has stalled, and external powers have filled the vacuum left by ideological deadlock.

The lesson is not about choosing the “right” ideology. It is about rejecting ideological certainty altogether. Sustainable democracy is built on credible institutions, economic diversification, political pluralism, and pragmatic engagement—not sanctions alone, and not slogans wrapped in sovereignty.

Venezuela’s crisis is not inevitable. But its warning is unmistakable: when ideology becomes destiny, nations fail – and citizens pay the cost.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Keith Bernard is a Guyanese-born, NYC-based analyst and a frequent contributor to News Americas. 

RELATED: Is Trinidad And Tobago Showing Signs Of A Failing State?

Better Jobs, Not Just More Visitors, Will Shape The Future Of Caribbean Tourism – World Bank

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY: For decades, tourism has been the Caribbean’s most powerful economic engine, driving foreign exchange earnings, employment, and growth across the region. But new analysis suggests that the sector’s future success of Caribbean tourism will depend less on rising visitor arrivals and more on a fundamental shift in the quality of jobs it creates.

According to research and analysis from the World Bank, tourism’s role in the Caribbean economy is undeniable. The sector contributes a significant share of regional GDP and supports millions of jobs, making it one of the largest sources of employment across island and coastal economies. Tourism also plays an outsized role in employing women and young people, often serving as the first point of entry into the labor market.

Yet, despite its scale and importance, tourism has struggled to consistently deliver stable, high-quality employment that allows workers to build long-term economic security.

The Job Quality Gap

While tourism creates jobs at a faster pace than many other sectors, those jobs are often characterized by seasonal contracts, income volatility, and limited career progression. As a result, workers may remain economically vulnerable even when employment levels are high.

World Bank analysis examining tourism employment in select Caribbean countries shows that tourism jobs generally outperform those in primary sectors such as agriculture, but often fall short of the quality found in manufacturing and other service industries. In practical terms, this means that tourism workers may have access to benefits and acceptable working conditions, but face weaker job stability and fewer opportunities to advance.

This instability is not evenly distributed. Young workers frequently hold entry-level tourism jobs that offer experience but little security, while women – who make up a majority of the sector’s workforce – continue to face persistent gaps in earnings and job quality. Rural communities and resort-adjacent areas also tend to see lower-quality tourism employment than urban centers, reinforcing geographic inequality.

Lessons From the Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the structural weaknesses of tourism-led growth. Border closures and travel restrictions triggered widespread job losses across the Caribbean, leaving hundreds of thousands of workers without income almost overnight. The crisis underscored how heavily tourism jobs depend on global conditions beyond the region’s control.

For policymakers and investors, the lesson was clear: tourism growth that is not paired with workforce resilience can quickly unravel in the face of external shocks.

As the region recovers, the focus is shifting from how many visitors arrive to how tourism revenues are distributed – and whether workers can rely on tourism jobs to support households during both good times and bad.

Rethinking Tourism As A Business Strategy

From a business and economic development perspective, improving job quality in tourism is increasingly seen as a competitiveness issue. Destinations that offer better-trained, more stable workforces are better positioned to deliver higher-quality visitor experiences, adopt digital tools, and pivot toward sustainable tourism models.

The World Bank points to several policy and market-oriented approaches that could help tourism generate better jobs. These include encouraging formal employment through simplified regulations and targeted incentives, expanding vocational and skills-based training aligned with digital and sustainable tourism trends, and strengthening enforcement of labor standards.

Equally important is building stronger linkages between tourism and the wider economy. When hotels, restaurants, and tour operators source more goods and services locally – from farmers and fishers to creatives and service providers—the economic benefits of tourism spread more broadly, supporting jobs beyond the hospitality sector itself.

A Turning Point For Caribbean Tourism

The Caribbean’s natural beauty, cultural assets, and proximity to major markets ensure that tourism will remain central to the region’s economic future. But the World Bank’s findings suggest that the next phase of growth will be defined not by volume alone, but by value – particularly the value created for workers.

For governments, businesses, and investors, the message is increasingly clear: tourism that delivers better jobs is more resilient, more inclusive, and better positioned to support long-term development.

As Caribbean nations rethink their tourism strategies, prioritizing job quality may prove to be the most important investment of all – one that strengthens both the industry and the communities that sustain it.

Guyana High Court Rejects Bid To Halt Extradition Proceedings Against Nazar And Azruddin Mohamed

News Americas, Georgetown, Guyana, Jan. 6, 2026: Guyana’s High Court has refused an application by businessmen Nazar Mohamed and his son, leader of the WIN, political party and presumed opposition leader, Azruddin Mohamed, to halt ongoing extradition proceedings in the Magistrate’s Court while their constitutional challenge to the country’s extradition laws is determined.

FLASHBACK – Azruddin Mohamed stands with his lawyers outside the Georgetown Magistrates’ Court during his ongoing US extradition proceedings.

In a ruling delivered today, Acting Chief Justice Navindra Singh, found that the applicants failed to satisfy the high legal threshold required for an interim stay of the committal proceedings, which are currently before Judy Latchman. The extradition hearings are set to continue on Tuesday.

The extradition request was initiated by the United States Government under the 1931 Extradition Treaty between the United States of America and Great Britain. Following an Authority to Proceed issued by Guyana’s Minister of Home Affairs, the Mohameds were arrested on October 31, 2025, and later released on bail pending the outcome of the committal proceedings.

Before the Magistrate’s Court, the applicants challenged the constitutionality of the Fugitive Offenders (Amendment) Act 2009 and sought a referral of constitutional questions to the High Court. That application was rejected by Magistrate Latchman, who ruled that the issues raised were frivolous and vexatious. The Mohameds subsequently filed a Fixed Date Application in the High Court and requested a stay of the extradition process.

In refusing the stay, Chief Justice Singh stressed that the filing of constitutional proceedings does not automatically suspend parallel statutory processes. He noted that stays in extradition matters are “exceptional, not routine,” and outlined three guiding considerations: whether the constitutional challenge raises serious and arguable issues, whether irreparable prejudice would result if proceedings continue, and where the balance of convenience lies between private rights and the public interest.

Addressing the applicants’ arguments, the Court rejected claims that the 2009 amendments unlawfully permit the Minister to bypass judicial oversight. The Chief Justice ruled that the legislation allows the Minister only to determine whether extradition proceedings should commence, while the courts retain full authority over committal hearings. He found no evidence that the Minister had attempted to circumvent judicial scrutiny in this case.

The Court also dismissed arguments that the amendments improperly cure alleged deficiencies in the 1931 treaty, including the absence of an express safeguard against onward extradition to a third state. Chief Justice Singh observed that such protection may exist by implication within the treaty and, in any event, noted that the United States has provided written assurances that the Mohameds would not be extradited to a third country without Guyana’s consent.

On claims relating to access to justice, the Chief Justice found no merit in the contention that the amendments restrict judicial remedies. He pointed out that safeguards such as habeas corpus remain available should the applicants be committed for extradition.

The Court further held that no irreparable harm would arise from allowing the committal proceedings to continue, noting that extradition hearings are preliminary in nature and do not determine guilt or innocence. Chief Justice Singh emphasized that no surrender order is imminent and that the substantive constitutional challenge is scheduled to be heard next week.

Balancing the competing interests, the Chief Justice concluded that the public interest in upholding Guyana’s international obligations and preventing abuse of constitutional litigation outweighed the applicants’ request for interim relief. He cautioned that routinely granting stays in extradition cases could undermine confidence in the administration of justice.

The application for a stay was therefore refused, with costs awarded. The substantive constitutional challenge is scheduled to be heard on January 14, 2026.

Caribbean Remittances By Major Countries: A Lifeline Powering Economies Across The Region

By NAN Business Editor

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY: Caribbean remittances remain one of the most powerful – and often overlooked – economic forces shaping the Caribbean today. For millions of families across the region, money sent home by relatives abroad helps pay for food, housing, healthcare, education, and small business survival. At a national level, remittances stabilize economies, boost consumer spending, and act as a buffer during economic shocks.

Windel Pierre, 41, a Haitian cab driver, sends money back to Haiti from Miami, FL. (Photo by Peter Whoriskey /The Washington Post via Getty Images)

According to regional estimates from ‘Remittances-to-Latin-America-and-the-Caribbean-in-2025-Adaptations-in-a-Context-of-Uncertainty,’ by the IDB, Caribbean nations were projected to receive approximately US $20.9 billion in remittances in 2025, underscoring the scale and importance of diaspora support across the region.

Top Caribbean Remittance Recipients

Based on country-specific estimates and global remittance rankings compiled from international development and financial data, several Caribbean nations stand out as the region’s largest remittance recipients:

CountryEstimated Annual Remittances (USD)HaitiUS $4.9 billionJamaicaUS $3.6 billionDominican RepublicUS $11,973 billionTrinidad & TobagoUS $361 millionGuyanaUS $1.4 billionSuriname US $166 millionBelize US $173 million

These figures provide a relative snapshot of remittance inflows rather than precise totals, as reporting methods vary by country. However, they clearly illustrate how deeply Caribbean economies are tied to their global diasporas.

Why Remittances Matter Beyond The Dollar Amount

While total remittance volumes tell one story, their real economic impact becomes clearer when viewed as a share of GDP.

In smaller Caribbean economies, remittances account for a substantial portion of national income. In countries such as Haiti and Jamaica, remittances have historically exceeded 20 percent of GDP, making them among the most remittance-dependent economies in the Western Hemisphere.

This level of dependence means remittances do more than supplement incomes — they help sustain national economic stability.

A Critical Social Safety Net

For Caribbean households, remittances often function as a private social protection system, filling gaps where public services or employment opportunities fall short. Families commonly use remittance income to:

Cover basic living expenses

Pay school fees and education costs

Access healthcare and medications

Repair homes after storms or disasters

Support elderly relatives

In economies where formal job markets are limited or volatile, remittances help reduce poverty and smooth consumption during economic downturns.

Diaspora Ties Drive Regional Resilience

The Caribbean’s remittance flows are rooted in long-standing migration patterns, particularly to North America. The United States remains the largest source of remittances to the Caribbean, accounting for roughly half of all inflows, followed by Canada, which contributes more than 10 percent.

These financial connections reinforce enduring social, cultural, and economic ties between Caribbean nations and their diaspora communities abroad.

A Steady Outlook Despite Global Uncertainty

Recent analyses indicate that remittance growth in the Caribbean has been moderate but steady, even amid global economic uncertainty. As labor markets in the U.S. and Canada continue to stabilize, remittance inflows are expected to remain resilient, providing ongoing support to Caribbean households and economies.

Development economists note that while remittances alone cannot replace comprehensive economic reform, they remain a critical pillar of Caribbean economic survival and resilience.

Looking Ahead

As Caribbean governments pursue growth strategies – from tourism and energy to agriculture and technology – remittances will continue to play a stabilizing role. Policies that reduce transfer costs, expand financial inclusion, and encourage productive investment of remittance income could further amplify their positive impact.

For now, the numbers are clear: the Caribbean’s diaspora is not just connected emotionally – it is economically indispensable.

REMITTANCES TO THE CARIBBEAN IN THE PAST