Posts

25 Years Later: Remembering The Caribbean Immigrants Who Died On 9/11

By Staff Writer, NewsAmericas Now

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. Sept. 11, 2026: As the nation marks 25 years since the September 11, 2001 attacks today, what is lost in the story is that more than 100 Caribbean immigrants who died on 9/11 remain largely absent from the national conversation, despite representing at least 14 different nations and territories across the region.

Guyana, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Barbados, Antigua and Barbuda, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, Dominica, Grenada, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Puerto Rico all lost sons and daughters that day, most of them working ordinary jobs in finance, food service, and building maintenance in the World Trade Center towers, having built new lives in New York after emigrating from home.

A first responder from Haiti

Karl Henry Joseph, a firefighter with Engine 207, was born in Haiti and lived in Brooklyn. He was among the first responders who rushed toward the towers as thousands fled, and he did not make it out.

A cricket star turned Navy technician

Kris Romeo Bishundat was just 23 when he died at the Pentagon. Born in Guyana, he had represented Guyana’s Under-19 cricket team before later becoming a U.S. Navy Information Systems Technician, living in Waldorf, Maryland at the time of his death.

Nizam Hafiz, also Guyana-born, had similarly played for Guyana’s Under-19 cricket squad and gone on to represent the USA National Cricket Team, working for Marsh & McLennan in the World Trade Center when he was killed.

An artist whose work foreshadowed his death

Michael Richards, a Jamaica-born artist living in Queens, New York, kept a studio on the 92nd floor of the World Trade Center’s Tower 1 as part of a work residency program. Richards had spent years creating sculptures depicting Black airmen, including the Tuskegee Airmen, and his work was known for imagery involving flight, sacrifice, and bodies pierced by aircraft, imagery that took on haunting new meaning after he died in the towers that morning.

A family of loss in Windows on the World

Kamini Singh and Ronald Singh both worked at Windows on the World, the restaurant atop Tower 1’s 107th floor, and both died there. Joyce Smith, born in Kingston, Jamaica, and Sarah Khan, who worked in food service on the same floor, were also lost.

Why their stories matter now

The anniversary arrives this year alongside renewed public reckoning over 9/11’s aftermath. Immigrant advocates argue that this lack of visibility reflects a broader erasure of immigrant contributions in American history. This is not just about symbolism — it’s about memory and belonging. Honoring Caribbean victims is honoring the immigrant backbone of New York. It is acknowledging that these men and women were part of the city’s heartbeat.

Some have called for Caribbean-specific commemorations each September, whether through school programs, church services, or cultural centers across the region and diaspora. Others want scholarship funds and community initiatives established in the names of those lost.New York City this week released 170,000 pages of previously undisclosed documents that Mayor Zohran Mamdani says show government efforts to mislead residents about dangerous air quality after the towers collapsed. “People got sick because the leaders they trusted lied and told them they were safe to breathe in toxic air,” Mamdani said at a Tuesday news conference, describing the release as overdue “accountability” for New Yorkers.

Many of the immigrants who died on 9/11, and the thousands more from Caribbean communities who worked in recovery and cleanup in the months that followed, were among those exposed to that toxic air without adequate protection. Twenty-five years later, the full human cost, both from that morning and from the years of illness that followed, remains difficult to fully account for.

SEE A FULL LIST OF THEIR NAMES HERE

NewsAmericasNow honors the more than 100 Caribbean immigrants lost on September 11, 2001, and continues covering the anniversary’s ongoing significance for the diaspora.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:

Caribbean Immigrant Reflects on Surviving 9/11

And Felicia J. Persaud remembers the Caribbean immigrants of 9/11

What If Sex Is Part Of The Caribbean’s Nation-Building Strategy?

By Dr. Isaac Newton

News Americas, Friday, Sept. 11, 2026: The Caribbean needs a better conversation about sex. For too long, we have talked about sex mainly through the language of danger, disease, morality, or shame. Yet good sexual health is focused on health, happiness, emotional connection, relationships, and quality of life. The World Health Organization recognizes sexual health as part of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being and says it remains important throughout life. The Caribbean does not need more sex. It needs a healthier understanding of sex.

Healthy sex begins with knowledge, consent, responsibility, fidelity, respect, and care. For married couples, sexual intimacy can strengthen emotional connection and contribute to relationship satisfaction and well-being. It can also be part of responsible family formation. The University of the West Indies has made sexual and reproductive health, fertility, family planning, counselling, and reproductive medicine important areas of Caribbean research and service. Its Hugh Wynter Institute exists specifically to advance reproductive health across the region. 

This conversation matters because Caribbean societies are changing. Fertility is declining, populations are aging, and migration continues to reshape our communities and workforces. Small states cannot ignore these realities. But the answer is not to tell people how many children to have. The answer is to build societies where people who freely want marriage and children have the health, knowledge, economic opportunity, social support, and confidence to build strong families. Population renewal should grow from human flourishing, not government pressure.

Our Christian heritage gives this issue a moral foundation. Scripture presents marriage as a covenant of love, companionship, fidelity, and family. Genesis speaks of husband and wife becoming “one flesh.” Proverbs celebrates marital love. Hebrews honors marriage. First Corinthians 7 recognizes mutual responsibility between husband and wife. The message is singularly clear: marital sex has a legitimate place in a healthy Christian marriage. It can express love, strengthen connection, bring joy, and contribute to family life. Sex deserves neither shame nor worship. It deserves ethical wisdom.

That wisdom must become practical. Churches can teach healthy marriage and responsible sexuality. Schools and health systems can provide accurate information and reproductive care. Couples can learn communication, fertility awareness, parenting, and conflict management. Governments can make it easier for families to secure housing, healthcare, childcare, education, and decent work. Caribbean institutions are already contributing to this work: UWI advances reproductive health and fertility care, while the University of the Southern Caribbean has participated with Johns Hopkins, Loma Linda, and Oakwood in research on health, family, and well-being in the Caribbean. 

The bigger idea is this: healthy people build healthy relationships; healthy relationships strengthen marriages; strong marriages nurture families; strong families strengthen communities; and resilient communities strengthen small nations. The Caribbean should therefore stop whispering about sex and start intentionally educating people about it with honesty, faith, science, responsibility, and dignity. We should help people live healthier lives, love more wisely, build stronger families when they choose to do so, and raise children who have reasons to believe in tomorrow. Nation building does not begin in Parliament. It begins with people. And the flourishing of a small nation is ultimately shaped by the health, love, relationships, families, and hopes of its people.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Dr. Isaac Newton is a leadership strategist, governance scholar, and author specializing in institutional excellence, ethical leadership, and human development. Educated at the University of the Southern Caribbean, Oakwood University, Princeton, Columbia, and Harvard, he writes on leadership, governance, and the development of people and institutions. He is the author of Fix It Preacher, Face Life Squarely, and Intimate Intimacy; and coauthor of Steps to Good Governance, Daring to Hope, When Nations Kneel, and The Belief Code.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Compromise or Concession? Rethinking Dr. Isaac Newton’s Approach to Intimacy

Guyana Police Intelligence Chief Admits Shredding, Burning Records Tied To Arrest Of Mohameds

By Staff Writer, NewsAmericas Now

News Americas, GEORGETOWN, Guyana, Thurs. Sept. 10, 2026: The head of the Guyana Police Force’s Special Branch intelligence unit testified today in a courtroom in Guyana that he shredded and burned records containing information about a US Marshal’s conversation with Azruddin and Nazar Mohamed following their October 31, 2025 arrest, a revelation that emerged during the ongoing extradition hearing against the two men.

Senior Superintendent Prem Narine denied defense lawyer Siand Dhurjon’s suggestion that the documents constituted the actual operational record of what took place the day of the arrest, but confirmed he destroyed the books using a shredding machine and by burning them at Special Branch headquarters in January 2026. “Well, I will put that to you that you’ve shredded and burnt the true operational record of what you did that day, which used to be in existence,” Dhurjon said. Narine responded: “No, I don’t agree with that.”

When asked whether any standing order or written policy required the destruction of the documents, Narine said he was obligated to destroy anything he personally considers secret. “Anything I consider that is a secret and should be destroyed, I do that… And for it to remain that way, I destroy it,” he testified. He initially cited the Official Secrets Act as his authority, then said he would need legal advice to clarify whether he was referring to a law or an internal police document. “I would have to get some legal advice on how to answer that. I’m not sure. I don’t know if I’m allowed to answer that,” he said. Prosecutor McKenzie told the court he was unsure what his own witness meant, and Chief Magistrate Judy Latchman noted that the head of Special Branch could not himself be “a signatory to a law.”

An unlogged conversation with a US Marshal

Narine also confirmed in court Thursday that he had permitted US Marshal Sandy Rao to hold a private conversation with the Mohameds, conducted in his view but out of his hearing, and that the conversation was never recorded in the Brickdam Police Station diary. Narine said he did not know what was discussed between the federal agent and the Mohameds, who are wanted in the US to face trial in a Florida federal court on charges of wire fraud, mail fraud and money laundering. The US Marshals Service is the lead federal agency for fugitive and extradition matters in the United States.

Defense raises political financing, prosecution alleges delay tactics

Azruddin Mohamed, founder of the WIN party, is now Guyana’s new opposition leader. (Photo by JOAQUIN SARMIENTO/AFP via Getty Images)

Earlier in Thursday’s session, the defense argued that Nazar Mohamed’s role as a financier of his son’s WIN political party supports its broader claim that the extradition case is politically motivated. Prosecutor Glenn Hanoman separately expressed frustration with what he described as repeated attempts by the defense to delay the extradition hearing as long as possible. Azruddin Mohamed is Guyana’s current opposition leader.

NewsAmericasNow will continue following developments in the Mohamed extradition case.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Guyana Opposition Leader Azruddin Mohamed Arrested Twice In One Night And Thrice In Days

Guyana Opposition Leader Returns To Court Today In Extradition Case

By Staff Writer, NewsAmericas Now

News Americas, GEORGETOWN, Guyana, Thurs. Sept. 10, 2026: Guyana opposition leader Azruddin Mohamed and his father, businessman Nazar Mohamed, return to the court today as their extradition proceedings resume, after the case was adjourned earlier this week due to a scheduling clash with a separate High Court matter.

The extradition hearing was adjourned to accommodate the Mohameds’ required testimony in a High Court contempt case involving social media personality Mikhail Rodrigues, known as the “Guyanese Critic.” The court was told the Mohameds were scheduled to appear before Justice Niles from 10 a.m. Tuesday for the contempt proceedings, which the outlet reported stem from an earlier defamation case in which a final order and injunction had been entered against Rodrigues restraining further defamatory statements. The Mohameds subsequently initiated contempt proceedings alleging that order was breached, and testimony in that matter had already begun, with the Mohameds expected before the High Court for the full day Tuesday, according to Guyana Chronicle.

The scheduling conflict prompted the extradition proceedings, which had been expected to continue this week, to be pushed to today, Thursday, September 10, running from 9 a.m. and expected to continue until midday. Meanwhile, the magistrate is weighing submissions on issues raised during the extradition hearing so far, with the prosecution having submitted its arguments and the defense granted until 4 p.m. Tuesday to respond in writing; a ruling is expected once the submissions and accompanying legal authorities are reviewed.

A police “spy chief” who can’t recall

Today’s resumption follows a dramatic session this week in which Prem Narine, head of the Guyana Police Force’s Special Branch intelligence unit, testified under cross-examination that he could not recall who instructed him to get involved in the extradition process against the Mohameds or to arrest them on October 31, 2025, according to Demerara Waves. Narine admitted his department is not responsible for investigating or prosecuting crimes and said he collected the extradition warrants from the Attorney General’s chambers without knowing who prepared them. He denied being personally instructed by President Irfaan Ali, but testified: “Standing here now, the information I have, I would consider him a threat to national security.”

WIN appeals to the international community

The extradition case has unfolded alongside a broader escalation involving Mohamed’s WIN party. Three party staff members were released after nearly 72 hours in police custody following a September 3rd incident involving allegations of drone activity near President Ali’s private residence, with one staff member requiring hospitalization while detained and two others reportedly transported home in handcuffs at approximately 2 a.m., their residences searched without warrants. WIN videographer Dwayne Ross has since been charged, pleaded not guilty, and was set free on bail of G $600,000.

WIN has formally appealed to CARICOM, the United Nations, foreign embassies and regional leaders including Mia Mottley and Kamla Persad-Bissessar, alleging political persecution. The party has also raised concerns over the disappearance of Mohamed’s Team Mohamed Facebook page, followed by more than 500,000 people, which became inaccessible while his devices remained in police custody.

NewsAmericasNow will continue following developments in the Mohamed extradition case. Reporting from Guyana Chronicle and Demerara Waves contributed to this story.

RELATED: Guyana Opposition Leader Azruddin Mohamed Arrested Twice In One Night And Thrice In Days

What Threat Did Pierre Damas Bel Pose To America?

By Felicia J. Persaud

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Thurs. Sept. 10, 2026: What threat did Pierre Damas Bel pose to America? It is a question I have been unable to shake since learning of the death by apparent suicide of the 20-year-old Haitian immigrant and college student in Springfield, Ohio.

Was he dangerous? From all reports, he was not. Was he a convicted criminal? According to his mentor, Pierre did not have a criminal record – “not even a traffic ticket.” Was he hiding from immigration authorities? No.

Pierre had presented himself at a U.S. port of entry through a CBP One appointment in March 2024. He was released into the United States and was continuing through immigration proceedings. He had also applied for asylum. So why did this young man need an electronic ankle monitor?

Pierre was an honors graduate of Springfield High School, a former JROTC member, and a young man reportedly immensely proud of his 3.8 GPA. Just days before his death, he had begun his freshman year at Wright State University, where he planned to study neuroscience before eventually attending medical school.

He worked at Texas Roadhouse, he loved soccer and had been recruited to play at the collegiate level. In other words, Pierre Damas Bel was doing many of the things America constantly tells immigrants they should do: learn English, get an education, work, obey the law and build something with their lives. And still, on July 29th, Immigration and Customs Enforcement placed an ankle monitor around his leg while his immigration case continued. DHS itself confirms that.

Think about what an ankle monitor means beyond immigration bureaucracy. It is visible to everyone – classmates, coworkers, church members, strangers walking past. And whether the government intends it or not, society associates that device with criminality.

Pierre apparently understood that stigma painfully well. According to reporting cited by his family and advocates, he wrote about feeling shame and humiliation after being fitted with the monitor. His father says Pierre was subsequently taunted by classmates and felt as though he was being treated “like an animal.” His family says Pierre twice went to regional ICE offices asking for the monitor to be removed so that he could play college soccer. It remained!

On August 31st, Pierre died after parking his car and entering traffic on Interstate 70 and being struck by a tractor-trailer. His family says he died by suicide. We should be careful here. Suicide is complex, and it would be irresponsible to reduce Pierre’s death to one cause. Wright State has also said it has no confirmed information about complaints or investigations concerning alleged bullying.

But none of that eliminates the question America should be asking: why was this young man electronically monitored in the first place? DHS‘s response after Pierre’s death was revealing. The agency described him as a “non-detained illegal alien” and said no one is required to remain in the United States illegally while wearing a monitor. It pointed instead to the government’s self-deportation program, under which eligible immigrants can receive a government-arranged flight and $2,600 after leaving.

“Remaining in the country illegally, while fighting removal, is a choice,” DHS said. Pierre apparently believed he had another choice. He could pursue his immigration case, he could pursue asylum, he could attend college, he could study neuroscience, he could work, he could play soccer, he could build a life, and one day perhaps save lives too.

And there is another uncomfortable context we cannot ignore. This happened in Springfield, Ohio – home to thousands of Haitian immigrants and the same community thrust into the national spotlight in 2024 by Donald Trump and his MAGA Party, after false claims that Haitians were eating residents’ pets were amplified during the presidential campaign.

Two years later, this young Haitian man in that community was walking around a college campus wearing an ICE ankle monitor despite, according to those who knew him, having no criminal record. Perhaps Trump’s America has become so consumed with labeling people “legal” and “illegal” that they have forgotten an important distinction: being in immigration proceedings is not the same thing as being a criminal.

Pierre Damas Bel was 20 years old, pursuing an education and a future. He could have contributed a lot to America and its health care system. Yet, America decided he needed to be tracked everywhere he went. So I return to the question with which I began: what threat exactly did young Pierre Damas Bel pose to America?

Felicia J. Persaud is the founder and publisher of  NewsAmericasNow.com, the only daily syndicated newswire and digital platform dedicated exclusively to Caribbean Diaspora and Black immigrant news across the Americas.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Milo Wanted Mass Deportation. Then He Got Deported.

Starting Over Hungry: Why Education, Hard Work, and Legal Status Do Not Always Protect Caribbean Immigrants From Food Insecurity

By Nyan Reynolds

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Tues. Sept. 8, 2026: There is a particular kind of pain that comes with starting over in a new country while already carrying the weight of hunger. It is not always visible. It does not always look like homelessness, or someone standing on a corner asking for help, or a family with nothing at all. Sometimes it looks like a well-dressed parent with an accent, a degree, a dream, and a refrigerator that is too empty for comfort.

That is the reality many Afro-Caribbean immigrants know all too well.

Migration Policy Data

The wider community is substantial. According to the Migration Policy Institute’s analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data, more than 9.1 million people in the United States were either born in the Caribbean or reported ancestry connected to a Caribbean country in 2023. By 2024, 5.3 million Caribbean immigrants lived in the United States, representing about 10 percent of the nation’s foreign-born population. This article focuses particularly on the Afro-Caribbean families whose experiences can disappear inside those larger numbers.

For many of us who came from parts of the Caribbean like Jamaica, migration was never just about movement. It was about survival, dignity, sacrifice, and the hope that if we left behind what was difficult, we might finally find something better. But one of the hardest truths to admit is that many immigrants do not arrive in America and suddenly step into abundance. They arrive with education, with discipline, with legal paperwork, with faith, and still find themselves hungry.

That contradiction deserves more attention than it gets.

The American imagination often paints immigration as a clean upward climb. Work hard. Stay out of trouble. Keep your head down. Sacrifice now and prosper later. But for many newly arrived legal immigrants, especially from the Afro-Caribbean community, the first chapter of life in America is not prosperity. It is pressure. It is trying to build a life while prices rise faster than your footing can settle.

And in today’s America, that pressure has become unbearable for many.

COST OF LIVING

The cost of food has gone up. Rent has gone up. Utilities have gone up. Gas has gone up. Childcare remains brutal. Health insurance can feel like a luxury. A family can do everything “right” and still find itself making decisions that feel impossible. Do we buy enough groceries this week, or do we keep the lights on? Do we fill the tank so we can get to work, or do we buy meat, rice, produce, and milk? Do we pay rent in full, or stretch meals for a few more days and hope nobody notices the difference? These are not theoretical questions. These are household decisions being made in silence every day.

The national numbers show how widespread this pressure has become. The U.S. Department of Agriculture reported that 18.3 million households, or 13.7 percent of all U.S. households, experienced food insecurity at some point in 2024. Among households with children, the rate rose to 18.4 percent. For households living below the federal poverty line, it reached 39.4 percent. These figures do not isolate Caribbean families, which is part of the problem: the specific hunger experienced within Caribbean immigrant communities remains too easily buried inside broader national categories.

And what makes this especially painful for Afro-Caribbean immigrants is that many arrive already understanding what scarcity feels like. Hunger is not new to them. They know what it means to make a meal out of very little. They know what it means to hear adults say, “Mi full,” not because they are satisfied, but because there is not enough to go around. They know what it means to eat strategically, not joyfully. To save the best portion for the child. To drink water and sleep early. To stretch one pot across multiple days.

So, when they arrive in the United States, there is often a deep emotional wound in realizing that the place they believed would offer relief still requires the same painful calculations. That is one of the most under-discussed aspects of migration: the emotional violence of discovering that the promised land can still leave you hungry.

For Afro-Caribbean immigrants, food is not just food. It is culture. It is memory. It is identity. It is one of the few things that keeps you connected to home when everything around you has changed. A pot of rice and peas, steamed cabbage, curry chicken, boiled green banana, fried dumpling, soup on a Saturday, porridge in the morning, these are not small things. They are emotional anchors. They remind you who you are.

But when you are newly arrived and trying to survive, even cultural food can become inaccessible. You walk into an American grocery store and realize quickly that what is familiar is expensive, and what is cheap often does not nourish you in the same way. Fresh produce costs more. Traditional ingredients are harder to find unless you live near a Caribbean market, and even then, they are often overpriced. So many immigrant families are forced to substitute, cut corners, or settle. And over time, those substitutions do not just affect health. They affect identity. They affect the dignity of being able to feed your family in a way that feels whole.

This is why food insecurity among migrants cannot be reduced to empty cabinets alone. It is structural, yes, but it is also deeply emotional.

It affects how people parent. It affects how they sleep. It affects their stress, their self-worth, and their sense of stability. A mother who cannot provide enough food for her children does not just feel financially strained. She often feels ashamed. A father who left his country to build a better life but still has to count slices of bread or skip meals can carry that disappointment like a private funeral. Children feel it too, even when adults try to hide it. They notice when portions get smaller. They notice when dinner becomes repetitive. They notice when the adults in the house say they are not hungry.

And the country often responds to this reality with policy that is too slow, too rigid, and too detached from lived experience.

One of the great contradictions of the American immigration system is that it often welcomes legal immigrants into the workforce before it welcomes them into the safety net. Under current SNAP rules, many lawful permanent residents are generally eligible only after a five-year waiting period unless they qualify for an exception, such as being under 18, having a qualifying disability, possessing sufficient work history, or having a qualifying U.S. military connection. A family can arrive legally, work legally, pay taxes, contribute to society, and still be expected to survive years without meaningful food support.

That should trouble us. Because if a nation benefits from immigrant labor, it cannot pretend immigrant hunger is someone else’s problem.

And this issue becomes even more urgent when viewed through the lens of strategic leadership. Hunger is not just a personal hardship. It is a systems failure. It is a policy issue. It is a public health issue. It is an educational issue. It is a workforce issue. A hungry family does not perform at its best. A hungry child does not learn at their best. A hungry worker does not show up with the same emotional capacity as someone who is secure. If we are serious about integration, economic mobility, and human dignity, then food security cannot remain an afterthought.

LEADERSHIP

This is where leadership in America must grow up. We often talk about leadership in terms of innovation, budgets, governance, and performance. But a country’s moral leadership is also revealed in whether people can eat. Whether families who followed the rules and came here to rebuild can access the most basic conditions needed to survive. Whether institutions can see beyond paperwork and understand the human reality of transition.

Starting over is expensive enough without hunger attached to it.

And for Afro-Caribbean immigrants, there is another layer that often goes ignored: many arrive highly capable and highly educated, but are still forced into economic instability because their credentials, accents, experiences, and cultural identities are not valued equally. There are nurses driving for rideshare apps. Teachers working overnight shifts. Professionals with degrees cleaning buildings or doing physically exhausting labor while waiting for one opportunity to break through.

Education does not always remove that vulnerability. MPI’s analysis of 2024 Census data found that one-quarter of Caribbean immigrants age 25 and older held at least a bachelor’s degree, including 30 percent of Jamaican immigrants. Yet the median income of Caribbean immigrant households was $66,500, well below the $81,400 reported for U.S.-born households, and 16 percent of Caribbean immigrants lived below the poverty line, compared with 12 percent of U.S.-born residents.

So, when people hear “legal immigrant,” they should not automatically imagine stability. They should understand that legality does not protect someone from underemployment, inflation, or exclusion. It does not guarantee food security. It does not guarantee dignity.

That is why this conversation matters now. Because where America stands today, many families are already stretched thin, and immigrants often feel the stretch first and hardest. The margin for error is smaller. One missed paycheck, one rent increase, one school expense, one utility spike, one car repair, and the entire household budget collapses. The idea of “starting over” sounds noble until you realize it often means rebuilding life with no cushion and no room to fail.

And yet, despite all of this, Afro-Caribbean communities continue to survive with a kind of resilience that deserves respect. They stretch. They share. They cook for one another. They carry plates across neighborhoods. They support church food drives. They send money back home while trying to stay afloat here. They hold one another up with the little they have. That resilience is beautiful, but it should not be romanticized to the point where it excuses neglect. People should not have to be heroic just to eat.

That is where this country has to do better. If America truly believes in opportunity, then it must confront the structural realities that make opportunity harder to reach for those beginning with less. That means revisiting waiting periods for food assistance. It means supporting culturally competent food access in immigrant neighborhoods. It means investing in urban food systems that do not leave working families trapped between convenience and malnutrition. It means understanding that hunger among migrants is not a side issue. It is central to whether integration succeeds or fails.

More importantly, it means listening. Because the people living this reality have been speaking for a long time. Their stories are not always polished. They are not always captured in policy briefs or academic language. Sometimes they are found in the mother stretching dinner for one more night. In the father standing in the grocery aisle calculating whether chicken is now too expensive this week. In the child learning too early that survival often means silence.

That is where this conversation begins. Not in theory, but in truth. For many Afro-Caribbean immigrants, the journey to America was never just about crossing borders. It was about trying to outrun instability. Trying to give children a better future. Trying to make suffering mean something. But there is something deeply unsettling about arriving in a nation of wealth and still being forced to negotiate with hunger.

No one migrates dreaming of food insecurity. No one leaves home hoping to choose between groceries and gas. No one starts over expecting to be educated, lawful, hardworking, and still hungry. And yet for too many, that is exactly what happens.

That reality should not be hidden behind pride, policy language, or political talking points. It should be named for what it is: a quiet crisis unfolding inside immigrant homes, especially in Afro-Caribbean communities, where starting over often begins not with comfort, but with sacrifice. If this country wants to call itself a land of opportunity, then it must do more than open the door. It must ask what happens after people walk through it. Because beginning again is hard enough. Beginning again hungry is something else entirely.

EDITOR’S NOTE: EDITOR’S NOTE: Nyan Reynolds is a U.S. Army veteran and published author whose novels and cultural works draw from his Jamaican heritage, military service, and life experiences. His writing blends storytelling, resilience, and heritage to inspire readers.  

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: The Butterfly That Never Landed: Remembering Eric Garner On His 12th Death Anniversary

Cuba Responds To Trump’s “Takeover” Map

By Staff Writer, NewsAmericas Now

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Weds. Sept. 9, 2026: Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel responded Tuesday to President Trump’s AI-generated map depicting Cuba and other territories under the US flag, declaring the island “will never again” be a colony of any “empire.”

“Cuba knows well the meaning of having been a colony and neocolony of two empires,” Díaz-Canel wrote on X, without explicitly naming Trump’s post. “The blood that has been shed for our independence, sovereignty and self-determination will not have been in vain, and we will defend them to the last consequences.”

Trump published the map on Truth Social, showing the American flag’s colors covering Mexico, Canada, Cuba, Greenland, Iceland, and parts of the wider Caribbean and Central America, including Cuba, Jamaica, Martinique, Guadeloupe, and Haiti. Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez responded with sharp sarcasm, warning the US government would leave its own citizens “geographically disoriented.” “Soon they will not know in which gulf, lake, building, country, continent or planet they are,” Rodríguez wrote.

Amid the highest US-Cuba tensions in decades

US President Donald Trump during the Steel Across America tour on the Ellipse of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2026. Photographer: Annabelle Gordon/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cuba’s response comes as relations with Washington face their most severe strain in decades. The Trump administration has pursued a “maximum pressure” campaign against Cuba since early 2026, including an oil blockade and secondary sanctions introduced in May that have discouraged foreign companies from operating on the island. Washington has also kept the possibility of military intervention on the table as an ongoing concern for Havana.

Rodríguez said that the US economic embargo cost Cuba $8.08 billion between March 2025 and February 2026, the highest 12-month total on record and 7% more than the previous year, calling the measures “cruel collective punishment” against the Cuban population. Cuba’s economy contracted 15% between 2020 and 2025, with independent forecasts projecting a further contraction of up to 10.3% this year amid an ongoing energy crisis.

President Trump posted an AI-generated map depicting the American flag superimposed over the United States, Canada, Mexico, Greenland, Iceland, and Caribbean islands – all relabeled simply as the “United States of America,” triggering diplomatic backlash and renewed public questioning of his fitness for office, according to The Hill.

The map, posted to Truth Social without caption or explanation, redrew continental North America entirely within the stars and stripes, with the Gulf of Mexico labeled the “Gulf of America” in line with an earlier executive order. It followed a weekend in which Trump posted at a rapid pace: 60 times on Sunday alone, according to an AFP count, followed by 37 more posts within roughly 10 hours on Monday, many featuring AI-generated or AI-manipulated images, including one claiming the Moon belonged to the US and another relabeling New Mexico as “New America.”

A pattern of territorial rhetoric

The map follows Trump’s repeated prior suggestions that Canada become the 51st US state, his stated interest in acquiring Greenland from Denmark, and his talk of “taking back” the Panama Canal. But the inclusion of Mexico, Iceland and several Caribbean territories in the latest map marks a new expansion of that rhetoric, The Hill reported. It also comes amid active US-Canada trade tensions, with both countries recently imposing tariffs on each other’s goods; Trump separately signed an executive order renaming Lake Ontario to “Lake America.”

Countries push back

Several of the countries depicted in the map responded swiftly. Iceland said it had summoned the US ambassador, describing the post as “entirely inappropriate.” Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum rejected the map directly on X: “We are a free, independent and sovereign nation,” she wrote, adding Mexico would be neither a colony nor a protectorate of another country. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen reiterated Denmark’s opposition to any US takeover of Greenland, telling reporters that both Greenland’s government and its people had repeatedly made clear they did not want to become American.

Iceland’s Foreign Minister Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir summoned U.S. Ambassador Billy Long to her office on Monday to “convey a clear message that the image was wholly inappropriate,” according to a statement.

“There was a reason to call the ambassador to a meeting and present a very clear message on our part that this was completely unacceptable,” she added Tuesday.

“I have been repeatedly advised by within the American administration that we should perhaps not take the current U.S. president literally, but we should take him seriously,” Gunnarsdóttir said. “That is exactly what we are doing and emphasizing that Iceland is sovereign, it is an independent state that is responsible for its own destiny.”

The map’s inclusion of Haiti added to the irony noted by observers online: even as Trump’s administration continues deporting Haitian nationals and has stripped Temporary Protected Status from roughly 350,000 Haitians earlier this year, his map depicted the country as part of an expanded American territory. Neither Jamaica, Haiti, nor France, of which Martinique and Guadeloupe are integrated overseas departments, responded.

Online mockery and fitness questions

The post drew widespread ridicule online alongside renewed speculation about Trump’s fitness for office. California state Senator Scott Wiener called the behavior “unbelievably dangerous,” alleging Trump had a “serious brain disease, whether dementia or something else.” Maine Congresswoman Chellie Pingree argued Republicans should be asking whether Trump remains fit to serve, and social media users noted the irony of the posts given years of Republican criticism of former President Biden’s age. It remains unclear whether Trump intended the map as a joke, a provocation, or simply an attempt to generate attention.

NewsAmericasNow will continue tracking Caribbean nations’ response to Trump’s territorial rhetoric.

No Word On Raising Sunken Guyana MV Barima As Crew Remains Jailed

By Staff Writer, NewsAmericas Now

News Americas, GEORGETOWN, Guyana, Weds. Sept. 8, 2026: More than three weeks after international bids were sought to salvage the sunken Guyana MV Barima, there is still no public update on when, or whether, the ferry will be raised, even as the vessel’s captain and two crew members were ordered to remain jailed on murder charges tied to the disaster Monday.

Vessel Captain Kevin Price, Chief Mate Rondell Roberts and Goods Superintendent Delon Granderson were further remanded to prison yesterday, Sept. 7th, after state prosecutors confirmed full disclosure of evidence had been handed to the defense, according to Kaieteur News. The men appeared virtually before Magistrate Ravindra Mohabir at the Charity Magistrate’s Court, which granted the defense until September 14th to review the evidence, with formal committal proceedings now scheduled to begin November 16th.

The three are jointly charged with 72 counts of murder in connection with the July 18 sinking that killed at least 72 people, with more than 30 others still missing and presumed dead. Price and Granderson are represented by attorney Dexter Smartt, alongside a legal team that includes Dexter Todd. Attorney Everton Lammy-Singh represents Roberts.

THE FERRY

The ferry capsized the night of July 18th en route to Port Kaituma, Region One from Georgetown, killing 73 people, including children. Seventy-six people survived. At least 30 people remain unaccounted for at sea, their bodies never recovered, with the sunken vessel itself still resting on the ocean floor with no comments from the Guyana People’s Progressive Party/Civic government on when the vessel could be raised or who the winning bidder is.

Jailed while the boat sits unrecovered

Price, Roberts and Granderson, all employees of Guyana’s Transport and Harbours Department, have now spent over 7 weeks in custody while the wreck that could hold answers, and the remains of missing passengers, remains unraised. Price broke down in tears during an earlier court appearance, alleging the government-assigned vessel was unseaworthy. “I ain’t deserve this, father God… I ain’t deserve this,” he told reporters, claiming the ferry lacked a functional anchor, radar, search and rescue transponders, and an Emergency Position-Indicating Radio Beacon, and that its inflatable life rafts had been expired since 2022.

Defense lawyers, legal commentators, and the political opposition have criticized the decision to file murder charges before the search for the missing has concluded and before the international Commission of Inquiry has begun its work. Police have maintained the charges followed legal advice from Director of Public Prosecutions Shalimar Ali-Hack, who has said her recommendation was based on the evidence presented, relevant principles of law, and case law authorities drawn from the United Kingdom, Commonwealth jurisdictions, and the European Court of Human Rights, along with public policy considerations.

Government authorities have continued to deny claims that the ferry was overloaded, even as survivors and grieving relatives maintain otherwise. Price has said a maritime inspection failed to write off the vessel despite its condition.

A Commission of Inquiry, established on July 30, 2026, with a five-member international commission and chaired by Justice Godfrey Phillip Smith, issued a public call for evidence this month as the team began preparatory work and invited public submissions regarding the July 18, 2026, maritime disaster.

NewsAmericasNow will continue following the MV Barima case and any developments on the vessel’s salvage.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: One Month After MV Barima Sank, Search Operations Have Ended, No Salvage Contractor Named, And Questions Remain

King Charles Absent As Jamaica Delivers $10 Billion Reparations Petition, UK PM Rejects Payment

By Staff Writer, NewsAmericas Now

News Americas, LONDON, UK, Tues. Sep. 8, 2026: A Jamaican delegation led by Culture Minister Olivia Grange delivered a historic reparations petition to Buckingham Palace on Monday, but King Charles was not present to receive it, and the British government used the occasion to flatly reject any prospect of paying reparations.

The petition asks the King to refer three questions to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, the final court of appeal for Jamaica and several other Commonwealth nations: whether the enslavement of Africans in Jamaica was legal under English law at the time, whether it violated international law, and whether the UK holds a legal obligation to provide compensation for slavery’s harms. The Jamaican delegation is seeking $10 billion in reparations, and organizers say it marks the first time a Commonwealth country has pursued this specific legal route. It came on Africa‑CARICOM Day 2026.

King Charles was in Scotland at the time and was not at the palace when the petition was delivered. Graham Smith, CEO of the anti-monarchy campaign group Republic, criticized the absence: “Once again Charles ducks for cover when the issue of slavery and empire is raised.”

The petition came as King Charles is set to tour several Caribbean countries this October.

CARICOM or the Caribbean Community has spent this year pressing its case for reparations with real momentum. Every CARICOM member state backed a United Nations resolution in March recognizing the transatlantic slave trade and racialized chattel enslavement of Africans as humanity’s gravest crime. In July, regional leaders approved a revised Ten-Point Plan for Reparatory Justice, renewing demands that European nations formally account for slavery, colonialism and Indigenous genocide.

There is just one detail complicating the moral clarity of that demand: eight of CARICOM’s own member states still have the British monarch as their head of state.

Who still answers to the Crown

A man holds a flag calling for reparations in Windrush square during the commemoration.. Fifth anniversary of remembering those who have been impacted by the Windrush scandal which saw people from the Caribbean treated like illegal immigrants by the Home Office despite arriving in Britain legally. (Photo by Thabo Jaiyesimi/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Belize, Grenada, Jamaica, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines remain Commonwealth realms, meaning King Charles III, not a president or a citizen of their own nations, sits constitutionally atop their governments. Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago, and Dominica removed the monarch decades ago, in the 1970s. Barbados was the most recent to go, becoming a republic in November 2021.

The contradiction is sharpest in the two countries that have been loudest on reparations. Jamaica’s government has said publicly, repeatedly, that it intends to remove the King as head of state. Foreign Minister Alando Terrelonge told reporters the country remained “hopeful” it would complete the constitutional reforms and referendum needed to do so, a target that has already slipped past its original 2025 deadline. Antigua and Barbuda’s Prime Minister Gaston Browne has likewise pledged a referendum on becoming a republic, calling it “the final step to complete that circle of independence.”

Neither has happened yet.

ANDY BURNHAM

Within hours, Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s spokesperson reiterated the government’s position. “The UK does not and will not pay reparations,” the spokesperson said, while separately describing slavery as “abhorrent.” Successive British governments have refused to engage in reparations discussions, even while acknowledging the country significantly benefited from the slave trade; no UK government has ever formally apologized for Britain’s role in sustaining it.

GRANGE

Despite the King’s absence and the government’s rejection, Grange told Reuters she remained “encouraged” by the process. She is separately seeking the return of Caribbean artefacts held in British museums. The petition comes a month after a United Nations committee concluded that countries are legally obligated to consider slavery reparations, warning that racial discrimination cannot be addressed without “a full commitment to review and redress the ongoing harms and consequences of the trafficking of enslaved Africans and racialised slavery.”

NewsAmericasNow will continue tracking developments in the Caribbean’s reparations movement.

RELATED: 

As Africa And The Caribbean Demand Reparations, A New Book Shows The British Crown Was The Architect – Not Just A Bystander

The Illegal Slave Trafficker’s Son Who Became The World’s First Guyana Born Black International Footballer

The Guns We Surrender, The Guns We Miss – A Smarter Firearm Policy For Small States

By Dr. Isaac Newton

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Tues. Sept. 8, 2026: A gun is surrendered at a police station. Somewhere, a family may breathe easier. Somewhere else, another family may still be waiting for answers. That single act can remove guns from circulation, but it can also erase an opportunity to discover where the weapon came from, who possessed it, and whether it was used to take a life. Small states should welcome voluntary surrender, but they must design it with eyes wide open. One gun recovered is progress. One crime concealed is a failure.

There is a legitimate place for a carefully designed surrender program. It can bring illegal firearms out of hiding and give people a lawful path to put them down. But surrender must never become immunity from accountability for serious crime. Every firearm should be secured, documented, traced, and forensically examined before disposal. A person may receive protection for unlawful possession covered by the program, but that protection should never become a shield against evidence of murder, robbery, trafficking, or another serious offense. Give people a safe way to surrender a weapon. Never give criminals a safe way to erase a crime.

THE PROGRAM

The program should have a clear beginning and an unmistakable end. During the surrender window, government can offer carefully regulated incentives for voluntary compliance. Every weapon becomes an intelligence opportunity: its serial number, condition, ammunition, provenance, and forensic history may help investigators understand what is moving through the country. After the window closes, enforcement should become stronger, not softer. Police, customs, immigration, and regional partners should use the intelligence gathered to identify trafficking routes, repeat offenders, and weapons that remain in circulation. Surrender should open the door to stronger security, not close the book on it.

Success must also be measured honestly. Count the weapons recovered, but then ask what happened because they were recovered. How many were linked to crimes? How many were traced? How many trafficking networks were disrupted? Did weapons return to the streets? Did shootings decline? If 500 old guns disappear while 600 new ones enter through trafficking, the country has collected weapons without reducing the danger. The real scoreboard is lives protected, crimes prevented, networks disrupted, and public trust strengthened.

For a small island state, every life matters and every public dollar must produce public safety. The best policy joins compassion with accountability: give people a safe path to surrender a weapon; give investigators every lawful opportunity to find the truth; give traffickers nowhere to hide; and give communities confidence that the law protects them. A gun should leave the street without taking the truth with it. Collect the weapon. Preserve the evidence. Close the loophole. Protect the people.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Dr. Isaac Newton is a leadership strategist, governance scholar, and author specializing in institutional excellence, ethical leadership, and human development. Educated at the University of the Southern Caribbean, Oakwood University, Princeton, Columbia, and Harvard, he writes on leadership, governance, and the development of people and institutions. He is the author of Fix It Preacher, Face Life Squarely, and Intimate Intimacy; coauthor of Steps to Good Governance, Daring to Hope, When Nations Kneel, and The Belief Code.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Caribbean Commentary – Pastors Who Matter