Posts

Vertières, With The V For Victory

By Guillermo Barreto

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Tues. Nov. 18, 2025: This year marks the 222nd anniversary of the Battle of Vertières. It took place on November 18 south of Le Cap, in what was then known as Saint Domingue. In that battle, which lasted five hours, Napoleon Bonaparte’s elite troops were defeated by battalions of former slaves led by Jean Jacques Dessalines, who consolidated the independence of what would henceforth be called Ayti or Haiti.

An infographic titled “1,247 killed in Haiti between July and September” created in Ankara, Turkiye on November 12, 2025. The United Nations Integrated Office in Haiti (BINUH) published its quarterly report on the Caribbean island nation, documenting 1,247 murders and 710 injuries between July and September. (Photo by Elif Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Haiti is always mentioned in the media in connection with misfortune. The poorest nation in the hemisphere, famine, cholera, violence. What is not mentioned is the cause of poverty or famine or the cholera epidemic or violence, consequences of centuries of colonial and neocolonial domination. At this moment, the situation is particularly serious, especially in the capital Port-au-Prince and in the Artibonite Department. In fact, a series of heavily armed gangs have taken control of large areas, unleashing unprecedented violence that has claimed more than 5,000 lives this year and caused the internal displacement of more than 1.3 million Haitians to safer areas of the country. The situation of children is particularly alarming. According to reports from UNICEF, 680,000 children have been displaced from their homes, 300,000 have interrupted their studies, either because schools have been destroyed or are being used as shelters, and 288,544 children under the age of 5 are at risk of malnutrition. It is important to note that displacement places children in a vulnerable situation, including health risks due to poor hygiene in shelters, malnutrition, and even forced recruitment by armed gangs. A recent report by Catherine Russell, Executive Director of UNICEF, estimated that 30 to 50 percent of gang members were minors, who are used as messengers, kitchen workers, sex slaves, and even forced to participate in acts of armed violence.

It is important to note that these gangs have destroyed vital infrastructure, including 38 hospitals, six universities, and libraries, and have forced more than 1,000 schools to close. All of this, and the resulting demobilization of the population that this violence entails, calls into question the idea that these are simply conflicts between criminal gangs. These gangs regularly receive weapons and ammunition from the United States, and this action indicates a project that seeks to make the functioning of a nation unviable. But this attack on the Haitian nation is not recent. Haiti has been under siege by imperial powers since its independence.

The island of Haiti was invaded by Christopher Columbus on his first voyage in 1492, establishing the first European settlement in Our America. The entire island became a colony of the Castilian, then Spanish, empire. In 1697, the Treaty of Ryswick between France and Spain granted the western part of the island to France, henceforth to be called Saint Domingue. The island was rich in resources, and Europeans, in need of labor, brought in millions of Africans who were kidnapped and enslaved to work in mines, plantations, and estates. It would not be an exaggeration to say that it was this wealth that provided the economic basis for the development of imperial France. In 1789, the year of the Storming of the Bastille in Paris, the colony had 793 sugar plantations, 3,150 indigo plantations, 3,117 coffee plantations, 789 cotton-producing units, and 182 rum distilleries. With a population of 40,000 whites and 28,000 free mulattoes, production was sustained by the slave labor of 452,000 Africans and their descendants, who made up 86% of the total population.

Control of the colony was characterized by unimaginable cruelty. Rebellions took place from the very beginning of the conquest of the territory. I highlight here the ceremony of Boïs Caiman in 1791, when Dutty Boukman and the voodoo priestess Cecile Fatima managed to gather 200 slaves and, in a ceremonial cry, swore to fight for their freedom. That same year, a massive uprising began with the burning of plantations and the killing of settlers. It was Tousant L’Overture who managed to organize an army and defeat the occupiers, declaring freedom for all. L’Overture trusted revolutionary France with its ideals of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, but that same revolution betrayed him, and he ended up dying in a cold prison in eastern France.

France decided to send an expeditionary force of 84 ships with 25,000 soldiers to regain control of its most precious colony and placed a sinister character in command: Donatien Marie Joseph de Vimeur, Count of Rochambeau. In his novel Estela, Emeric Bergeaud describes him as follows: “his small stature, his angular features, his haughty gaze, which complement the approximate portrait of his moral ugliness.” Rochambeau committed atrocities from the moment he landed in Saint Domingue, including the use of dogs trained to hunt and kill. In a letter to his commander Ramel dated May 6, 1803, he writes: “I am sending you, my dear commander, a detachment of 50 men from the Cape National Guard, commanded by M. Bari; they are bringing 28 mastiffs. These reinforcements will also enable you to complete your operations. I will not let you ignore that you will not be paid any rations or expenses for feeding these dogs. You must give them blacks to eat.”

Rochambeau did not count on the determination of a people fighting for their freedom. L’Overture did not die in vain, and the flags he waved were taken up by Jean Jacques Dessalines, who led the resistance and heroically defeated the most powerful army in Europe at Vertières 222 years ago.

Dessalines assumed power as emperor, as Napoleon Bonaparte would do that same year. But unlike Napoleon, Dessalines promoted a constitution for a nation of free men and women. Slavery was abolished forever, freedom of worship was established, and divorce was permitted. Likewise, respect for the self-determination of peoples was established, without this preventing Dessalines from supporting revolutionaries such as Francisco de Miranda or, later, Alexandre Pétion and Simón Bolívar. The latter not only obtained ships, weapons, ammunition, and combatants. Bolívar obtained a political project from the Haitian revolution, and from there the Liberation Army would become a popular army that would end Spanish colonial rule from the Caribbean coast to the Andean highlands. Haiti was a beacon of light on the continent.

Today, when US imperial arrogance threatens the entire continent with its military power, we must remember that powerful imperial armies have been defeated time and again by the Caribbean peoples. The Battle of Vertières is a historical milestone that has been rendered invisible by hegemonic historiography. The Haitian feat must be studied, discussed, and understood. Haiti was a beacon of light that today succumbs to the interests of the Global North but carries within it the seed of rebellion, just as the Caribbean peoples who inherited that seed. Today, in the face of the military threat from the United States in the Caribbean, we remember the Battle of Vertières and what peoples are capable of when they are determined to decide their own destiny.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was produced by Globetrotter. Guillermo R Barreto is Venezuelan and holds a PhD in Science (Oxford University). Retired professor at Simón Bolívar University (Venezuela). He was Deputy Minister of Science and Technology, president of the National Science and Technology Fund, and Minister of Ecosocialism and Water (Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela). He is currently a researcher at the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research and a visiting collaborator at the Center for the Study of Social Transformations-IVIC.

Trump Slips Up And Tells The Truth: America Needs Immigrants

By Felicia J. Persaud

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. Nov. 21, 2025: Every now and then, the impossible happens. Water runs uphill. Pigs fly. And Donald J. Trump tells the truth.

Yes, you read that right. The man famous for “alternative facts” and creative truth-telling has done something few thought possible – he admitted a fact backed by evidence.

In a recent interview with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham, Trump acknowledged something that economists, CEOs, and anyone who’s ever tried to hire a qualified engineer already knows: there aren’t enough skilled workers in the U.S.

“You don’t have certain talents, and people have to learn,” Trump said. “You can’t just say a country is coming in, going to invest $10 billion to build a plant and take people off an unemployment line who haven’t worked in five years and they’re going to start making their missiles. It doesn’t work that way.”

Well, imagine that – Trump, the man who built a political brand on blaming immigrants for everything from job losses to border chaos, now admitting that America needs immigrant talent.

The $100,000 Visa Wall

Of course, this flash of honesty comes wrapped in contradiction. Just weeks earlier, Trump imposed a $100,000 one-time fee on H-1B visas – the very program designed to attract high-skilled foreign workers in fields like tech and engineering.

The result? A policy that economists say could “kneecap” American innovation. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, startups with higher H-1B hiring rates are far more likely to go public, get acquired, or secure major patents and funding.

In fiscal 2024, nearly 400,000 H-1B visas were approved – double the number from 2020. And leaders like Elon Musk have long argued that these visas help keep the U.S. competitive globally. Yet, Trump’s fee ensures only billion-dollar corporations, not startups or universities, can afford them.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick defended the fee at the time, saying, “If you have a very sophisticated engineer and you want to bring them in… then you can pay $100,000.” Easy to say when you’re not a small business owner trying to hire one.

Raiding The Future

Protesters demonstrate against anti-immigration raids while outside a closed Latino-owned bakery on November 18, 2025 in Charlotte, North Carolina. Some businesses have shut down in Charlotte, fearing federal agents will target their customers during the ongoing Operation Charlotte’s Web to detain undocumented immigrants in the city. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)

Trump’s newfound appreciation for skilled immigrants also comes after his ICE agents raided a Hyundai factory in Georgia, detaining 475 workers like common criminals – most of them South Korean specialists building EV batteries.

The raid delayed production by months and infuriated South Korea and Hyundai’s leadership, which had just announced a $26 billion U.S. investment. Trump now admits the move may have gone too far.

“You know, making batteries is very complicated,” he told Ingraham. “They had like 500 or 600 people, early stages, to make batteries and to teach people how to do it. Well, they wanted them to get out of the country. You’re going to need that, Laura.”

So, after deporting the very workers teaching Americans how to build the clean energy technology of the future, Trump now realizes – oops – maybe we actually need them.

The Truth He Can’t Escape

For once, Trump has stumbled into reality: the U.S. simply doesn’t have enough engineers, scientists, and skilled tradespeople to meet demand. Immigrants fill those gaps – and have for generations.

But here’s the kicker – while Trump admits the truth about America’s talent shortage, he’s still enforcing policies that make it harder for those very workers to come, stay, or succeed.

Economists at the National Foundation for American Policy estimate that his immigration agenda would cut the U.S. workforce by 15.7 million people and shrink GDP growth by one-third over the next decade. In other words, “America First” is starting to look a lot like “America Left Behind.”

So yes, Donald Trump finally told the truth – but like so many times before, he’s standing in the way of it.

Felicia J. Persaud is the founder and publisher of NewsAmericasNow.com, the only daily newswire and digital platform dedicated exclusively to Caribbean Diaspora and Black immigrant news across the Americas.

10 Keys To Transformative Leadership

By Dr. Isaac Newton & Olivia Lindsay

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Mon. Nov. 24, 2205: Leadership is less a rank and more a moral architecture, a set of habits, priorities, and choices that shape institutions, cultures, and lives. Whether you are stepping into your first formal leadership role or have decades of stewardship behind you, the same essentials govern influence that endures. These ten keys are ordered not by novelty but by the values that sustain effectiveness and the performance that follows. They blend timeless wisdom with practical lessons drawn from advising governments, leading enterprises, and cultivating human potential across diverse contexts.

Use this list as a compass. Let it correct your course when tides rise and keep you steady when applause fades.

1. The Power of Asking
Great leaders move the world by opening mouths as often as they open doors. Asking is an act of agency and humility. It mobilizes resources, secures partnerships, and signals confidence in others. Ask strategically for help, for bold commitments, for the impossible. When you lean on this principle, opportunities stop being distant and begin to assemble around you.

2. The Strength of the Circle
Leadership is never a solo sport. Your inner circle is your operating system: loyal, wise, candid, and discreet. Invest in people who correct you, celebrate you, and expand your reach. Where strategy meets synergy, execution becomes inevitable.

3. The Impact of Integrity
Trust is the currency of lasting influence. Integrity is not a tactic; it is the soil in which reputation grows. Make truth your default posture, especially when silence or spin would be easier. The leader who pays this price earns loyalty that outlasts titles and withstands storms.

4. The Courage to Decide
Decisions create direction. The paralysis of over analysis steals momentum and morale. Weigh wisely, seek counsel, then decide with resolve. Even imperfect decisions are preferable to indecision, for they invite correction, learning, and forward motion.

5. The Duty of Leverage
Every platform, meeting, and acquaintance is a seedbed for mutual uplift. Leverage is not exploitation; it is stewardship, using your access to create returns for your people and multiply impact. Treat each opportunity like an investment in collective destiny.

6. The Balance of Reward
Discipline and delayed gratification are virtues, but joy fuels persistence. Reward your teams and yourself in ways that sustain morale today and secure the future tomorrow. A leader who neglects both risks burnout and the erosion of loyalty.

7. The Joy of Mentorship
Mentorship is leadership’s force multiplier. Teaching others to lead multiplies your influence and ensures continuity. Build apprenticeship into your culture. Your legacy will be measured less by what you build than by who you raise.

8. The Art of Common Ground
Progress is made where bridges are built, not where walls are fortified. Seek the overlap between competing visions and translate difference into shared purpose. Leaders who find common ground win the long negotiations that change systems.

9. The Strength of Struggle
Adversity is the crucible of character. The leader who avoids struggle often evades growth. Reframe hardship: it is not punishment but refinement. Let trials teach endurance, clarity, and humility.

10. The Value of Family
All leadership is ultimately relational. Family, whether biological, chosen, or communal, is the anchor that steadies vocation. Protect it, prioritize it, and let it remind you that the worthiest measures of success are human and not merely institutional.

How These Keys Fit Together

Values such as integrity, family, and mentorship form the foundation. Effectiveness expressed through asking, building circles, and leveraging opportunity is the engine. Performance revealed in decisions, rewards, struggles, and finding common ground is the outcome. The three exist in a living cycle: values shape effectiveness, effectiveness drives performance, and performance tests values. Make this cycle intentional and watch influence convert into lasting transformation.

A Short Practical Regimen
        1.      Ask for one bold meeting or resource this week.
        2.      Check in with your inner circle through one direct, honest conversation.
        3.      Make one decision you have been deferring.
        4.      Mentor or be mentored for thirty minutes.
        5.      Give one immediate, meaningful reward to someone on your team.

Five small acts, compounded over time, can change entire organizations.

A Leader’s Charge

Whether young in experience or seasoned in leadership, remember this. Leadership is both a gift and a stewardship. You will be measured by the causes you champion and the people you empower. Choose the long road of integrity over the short road of convenience. Ask boldly. Build faithfully. Decide with courage. Love your people and return to them the dignity leadership borrows.

History rewards those who pair vision with humility and strategy with conscience. If you carry these keys into your daily work, you will not only lead institutions but also transform lives. Let wisdom be your wealth, and let service be your signature.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Dr. Isaac Newton is a strategist and scholar trained at Harvard, Princeton, and Columbia. He advises governments and international institutions on governance, transformation, and global justice, helping nations and organizations turn vision into sustainable progress.

Olivia Lindsay is an entrepreneur and leadership strategist with over fifteen years of experience in marketing, business development, and strategic planning. She is the founder of 876 On the Go, a technology-driven logistics company, and a Justice of the Peace. Olivia holds degrees in Management Studies and Strategic Planning and is completing her Ph.D. in Business Administration.

Together, they champion a model of leadership where integrity meets innovation and influence serves the greater good.

The Caribbean Faces Two Choices: Join the US Attempt To Intimidate Venezuela Or Build Its Own Sovereignty

By Vijay Prashad

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Thurs. Nov. 27, 2025: US President Donald Trump has authorised the USS Gerald R. Ford to enter the Caribbean. It now floats north of Puerto Rico, joining the USS Iwo Jima and other US navy assets to threaten Venezuela with an attack. Tensions are high in the Caribbean, with various theories floating about regarding the possibility of what seems to be an inevitable assault by the US and regarding the social catastrophe that such an attack will occasion. CARICOM, the regional body of the Caribbean countries, released a statement affirming its view that the region must be a “zone of peace” and that disputes must be resolved peacefully. Ten former heads of government from Caribbean states published a letter demanding that “our region must never become a pawn in the rivalries of others.”

Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine enjoys doubles with Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar at a meeting in Trinidad on Nov. 26, 2025. (Facebook image)

Former Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Stuart Young said on 21 August, “CARICOM and our region is a recognized zone of peace, and it is critical that this be maintained”. Trinidad and Tobago, he said, has “respected and upheld the principles of non-intervention and non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries and for good reason”. On the surface, it appears as if no one in the Caribbean wants the United States to attack Venezuela.

However, the current Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago, Kamla Persad-Bissessar, (known by her initials as KPB), has openly said that she supports the US actions in the Caribbean. This includes the illegal murder of eighty-three people in twenty-one strikes since 2 September 2025. In fact, when CARICOM released its declaration on the region being a zone of peace, Trinidad and Tobago withdrew from the statement. Why has the Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago gone against the entire CARICOM leadership and supported the Trump administration’s military adventure in the Caribbean?

Backyard

Since the Monroe Doctrine (1823), the United States has treated all Latin America and the Caribbean as its “backyard”. The United States has intervened in at least thirty of the thirty-three countries in Latin America and the Caribbean (90 percent of the countries, in other words) —from the US attack on Argentina’s Malvinas Islands (1831-32) to the current threats against Venezuela.

The idea of the “zone of peace” emerged in 1971 when the UN General Assembly voted for the Indian Ocean to be a “zone of peace”. In the next two decades, when CARICOM debated this concept for the Caribbean, the United States intervened in, at least, the Dominican Republic (after 1965), Jamaica (1972-1976), Guyana (1974-1976), Barbados (1976-1978), Grenada (1979-1983), Nicaragua (1981-1988), Suriname (1982-1988), and Haiti (1986).

In 1986, at the CARICOM summit in Guyana, the Prime Minister of Barbados, Errol Barrow, said “My position remains clear that the Caribbean must be recognised and respected as a zone of peace… I have said, and I repeat, that while I am prime minister of Barbados, our territory will not be used to intimidate any of our neighbours be that neighbour Cuba or the USA.” Since Barrow made that comment, Caribbean leaders have punctually affirmed, against the United States, that they are nobody’s backyard and that their waters are a zone of peace. In 2014, in Havana, all members of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) approved a “zone of peace” proclamation with the aim “of uprooting forever threat or use of force” in the region.

Persad-Bissessar or KPB has rejected this important consensus across political traditions in the Caribbean. Why is this so?

Betrayals

In 1989, trade union leader Basdeo Panday formed the United National Congress (UNC), a centre-left formation (whose former name was the Caucus for Love, Unity, and Brotherhood). KPB joined Panday’s party and has remained in the UNC since then. Throughout her career till recently, KPB stayed at the centre of the UNC, arguing for social democratic and pro-welfare policies whether as opposition leader or in her first term as Prime Minister (2010-2015). But even in her first term, KPB showed that she would not remain within the bounds of the centre-left but would tack Far-Right on one issue: crime.

In 2011, KPB declared a State of Emergency for a “war on crime”. At her home in Phillipine, San Fernando, KPB told the press, “The nation must not be held to ransom by groups of thugs bent on creating havoc in our society”, “We have to take very strong action”, she said, “very decisive action”. The government arrested seven thousand people, most of them released for lack of evidence against them, and the government’s Anti-Gang Law could not be passed: this was a policy that mimicked the anti-poor campaigns in the Global North. Already, in this State of Emergency, KPB betrayed the legacy of the UNC, which she dragged further to the Right.

When KPB returned to power in 2025, she began to mimic Trump with “Trinidad and Tobago First” rhetoric and with even harsher language against suspected drug dealers. After the first US strike on a small boat, KPB made a strong statement in support of it: “I have no sympathy for traffickers, the US military should kill them all violently”. Pennelope Beckles, who is the opposition leader in Trinidad and Tobago, said that while her party (the People’s National Movement) supports strong action against drug trafficking, such action must be “lawful” and that KPB’s “reckless statement” must be retracted. Instead, KPB has furthered her support of the US militarisation of the Caribbean.

Problems

Certainly, Trinidad and Tobago faces a tight knot of economic vulnerability (oil and gas dependence, foreign exchange shortages, slow diversification) and social crises (crime, inequality, migration, youth exclusion). All of this is compounded by the weakness of State institutions to help overcome these challenges. The weakness of regionalism further isolates small countries such as Trinidad and Tobago, which are vulnerable to pressure from powerful countries. But KPB is not only acting due to pressure from Trump; she has made a political decision to use US force to try and solve her country’s problems.

What could be her strategy? First, get the United States to bomb small boats that are perhaps involved in the centuries-old Caribbean smuggling operations. If the US bombs enough of these little boats, then the small smugglers would rethink their transit of drugs, weapons, and basic consumer commodities. Second, use the goodwill generated with Trump to encourage investment into Trinidad and Tobago’s essential but stagnant oil industry. There might be short-term gain for KPB. Trinidad and Tobago requires at least $300 million if not $700 million a year for maintenance and for upgrading its petrochemical and Liquified Natural Gas plants (and then it needs $5 billion for offshore field development and building new infrastructure). ExxonMobil’s massive investment in Guyana (rumoured to be over $10 billion) has attracted attention across the Caribbean, where other countries would like to bring in this kind of money. Would companies such as ExxonMobil invest in Trinidad and Tobago? If Trump wanted to reward KPB for her unctuousness, he would tell ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods to expand on the deepwater blocks investment his company has already made in Trinidad and Tobago. Perhaps KPB’s calculation to set aside the zone of peace ideas will get her some more money from the oil giants.

But what does this betrayal break? It certainly disrupts further any attempt to build Caribbean unity, and it isolates Trinidad and Tobago from the broader Caribbean sensibility against the use of the waters for US military confrontations. There are real problems in Trinidad and Tobago: rising gun-related violence, transnational trafficking, and irregular migration across the Gulf of Paria. These problems require real solutions, not the fantasies of US military intervention. US military interventions do not resolve problems, but deepen dependency, escalate tensions, and erode every country’s sovereignty. An attack on Venezuela is not going to solve Trinidad and Tobago’s problems but might indeed amplify them.

The Caribbean has a choice between two futures. One path leads toward deeper militarization, dependency, and incorporation into the US security apparatus. The other leads toward the revitalization of regional autonomy, South-South cooperation, and the anti-imperialist traditions that have long sustained the Caribbean’s political imagination.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was produced by Globetrotter. Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor, and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter. He is an editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than 20 books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations. His latest books are On Cuba: Reflections on 70 Years of Revolution and Struggle (with Noam Chomsky), Struggle Makes Us Human: Learning from Movements for Socialism, and (also with Noam Chomsky) The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and the Fragility of US Power.

Source: Globetrotter

The Guyana EU Observers Report: Valid Recommendations Undermined By Questionable Framing

By Ron Cheong

News Americas, TORONTO, Canada, Fri. Nov. 28, 2025: The 2025 Guyana elections were peaceful, professionally executed, and despite heated rhetoric – remarkably smooth. But the debate that followed has been anything but. A jarring divergence emerged between the EU Observer Mission’s report and the assessments of other credible bodies, most notably the UNDP-backed evaluations.  This exposed a bigger problem than election flaws – it exposed flawed narratives.

EU Observers release the report during a press conference at the Pegasus Suites and Corporate Centre in Kingston, Georgetown

When observers of equal stature view the same election and reach drastically different conclusions, the issue is no longer merely technical. It becomes a question of narrative, framing, and responsibility.

This piece is necessary precisely because of lingering dissonance from that gap. The European Union is held in high regard in Guyana. Its voice carries weight. When such a respected institution fields an observer team whose findings appear unbalanced, selectively sourced, or not fully reflective of the on-the-ground realities, it does a disservice – not only to Guyana, but to the EU’s own reputation as a neutral democratic partner.

A Country With Hard -Won Electoral Stability

To understand the gravity of this, one must recall that Guyana’s democracy is young and was severely tested just five years ago. The 2020 elections saw an unprecedented attempt by the incumbent to overturn the results. It took five months of diplomatic pressure – from the US, EU, CARICOM, the Commonwealth, and others – to ensure that voters’ will was respected and that the rightful government was sworn in.

That experience shaped both domestic expectations and international sensitivities for 2025. Guyanese citizens, political actors, and observers alike were determined that such a crisis should never repeat.

GECOM’s Improved Performance: A Rare Institutional Success

Against this backdrop, GECOM’s performance in 2025 stands out as a quiet institutional success. UNDP-supported capacity building, new monitoring mechanisms, stronger training for presiding officers, and clearer chain-of-custody procedures all contributed to an election that many experienced observers judged to be the most professionally administered in recent memory.

Polling stations opened on time, security forces remained neutral and restrained, tabulation procedures were transparent, and the count proceeded without credible interference. These are fundamental pillars of electoral integrity, and Guyana delivered on each of them.

The EU’s Report: Valid Recommendations Undermined by Questionable Framing

The EU report did contain useful recommendations – many relating to administrative efficiency and long-term institutional strengthening. But these were overshadowed by assessments that seemed out of step with observable realities.

A notable example was the claim that the “dominance of state media and politicised private media reduces voters’ ability to access pluralistic and balanced information.”
This assertion collapses under scrutiny.

Guyana’s media is not dominated by the state; it is dominated by polarisation.  Stabroek News and Kaieteur News often adopt openly adversarial stances against the government.  Guyana Times, in contrast, leans in the direction of the governing party, and the state-owned Chronicle typically reflects the views of whichever party is in power at the time. This environment can indeed confuse voters – but not because of a lack of pluralism.  The problem is an excess of partisanship, not its absence.

When the EU report implies state dominance, it fundamentally mischaracterizes the landscape and, by extension, misdiagnoses the problem.

Unfair Assumptions and Uneven Standards

Other parts of the EU report raised similar concerns. The suggestion that building schools, hospitals, and public infrastructure constituted an “incumbency advantage” borders on the absurd.  By that logic, any functional government that improves public services in an election year is unfairly influencing voters – an argument that would render many European governments equally suspect.

Similarly, criticizing the President for using a government helicopter—without contextualizing that a previous President used military helicopters more extensively, or that such travel is often a security necessity in a country with vast, remote regions – reveals a troubling lack of comparative perspective.

The Real Risks: Not Ballot Fraud, But Fragile Narratives

The 2025 elections show that Guyana’s most significant vulnerabilities do not lie in ballot integrity or election-day operations. They lie in political narratives – domestic and international – that can be shaped by incomplete evidence or preconceived expectations.

Observer missions carry immense influence. When their assessments diverge sharply, especially in ways that do not reflect the balance of evidence, they can fuel political distrust rather than reduce it.

Getting The Story Right

Guyana deserves scrutiny. But it also deserves accuracy. The 2025 elections were not perfect, yet they were peaceful, credible, and competently run. When an observer report magnifies weaknesses while overlooking strengths documented by others, it risks misrepresenting a country that has fought hard for democratic stability.

International community representatives seeking to help Guyana strengthen its democracy, must do the hard work of being thorough and balanced and follow basic democratic principles:

Highlight both positives and negatives – the multi-dimensional reality as it is rather than a narrowly focused narrative.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Ron Cheong, born in Guyana, is a community activist and dedicated volunteer with an extensive international background in banking. Now residing in Toronto, Canada, he is a fellow of the Institute of Canadian Bankers and holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Toronto. His comments are his own and does not reflect those of News Americas or its parent company, ICN.

St. Vincent And The Grenadines – Rethinking Power, Renewal And The Future Of Opposition

By Dr. Isaac Newton

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. Nov. 28, 2025: In the stillness that followed the 2025 St. Vincent and the Grenadines elections, Ralph Gonsalves’ single surviving seat felt less like a victory and more like a solitary echo from a fading era. Twenty-four years in office had stretched the limits of public patience, and the country’s quiet hunger for renewal finally spoke in unmistakable terms. The call for transition was not hidden. It was visible in drifting supporters, weary faces, and the simple question lingering in every community: What more could truly be offered after a quarter century of the same voice at the helm? The result was not just a loss. It was the public’s firm declaration that leadership must remain rooted in awareness, not memory.

FLASHBACK – Prime Minister of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Ralph Gonsalves at the end of EU-CELAC Summit in Brussels, Belgium on July 18, 2023. (Photo by Nicolas Landemard/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

The ULP’s unraveling did not happen overnight. It grew in the gap between the party’s internal culture and the country’s evolving needs. When a political movement stops thinking, stops questioning itself, and stops grooming new leaders, it becomes fragile long before the ballots are cast. Treating politics as an extension of personal legacy rather than a living partnership with the people created a disconnect that no speeches could repair. The defeat, therefore, was not surprising. It was the natural outcome of a leadership style that treated continuity as a strategy and familiarity as a plan.

Even so, the moment carries potential. Renewal begins with the simple act of listening without defensiveness. It requires conversations in homes, markets, church halls, and bus stops, not to reclaim power but to understand what the country is truly becoming. Fresh leadership must be cultivated with the discipline of mentorship and the courage to allow younger voices to shape new directions. Real solutions emerge when a party studies the present instead of rehearsing its past, taking the time to gather evidence, understand trends, and design policies that respond to lived experiences rather than assumptions.

Rebuilding the opposition will demand structure, curiosity, and intellectual honesty. A reformed opposition must start by assembling a broad national advisory group capable of producing ideas that matter: economic relief frameworks, community safety initiatives, youth employment pipelines, and modern governance standards. The party must invest in training organizers, communicators, and researchers who can engage the public with clarity and respect. Most importantly, it must show through consistent action that it values transparency, genuine debate, and shared leadership. Only then can the opposition grow into an institution the country takes seriously, not because of its past, but because of the future it is willing to design with discipline and imagination.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Dr. Isaac Newton is a strategist and scholar trained at Harvard, Princeton, and Columbia. He advises governments and international institutions on governance, transformation, and global justice, helping nations and organizations turn vision into sustainable progress.

The Godwin Friday Era Begins In St. Vincent & The Grenadines: The Brilliance Of Turning The Corner

By Dr. Isaac Newton

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Tues. Dec. 2, 2205: Dr. Godwin Friday’s sweeping victory on November 27, 2025, is much more than a political shift. It is a national rebellion. It signals that the people of St. Vincent and the Grenadines are stepping into a new maturity where dignity is protected, accountability is expected, and shared purpose becomes the compass for public life. Small island states now stand at a global intersection. Economic pressures tighten. Climate threats intensify. Cultural bonds are strained.

Wars cast long shadows across continents. The United States has warned that Venezuelan airspace is too dangerous for civilian use, a sign that regional instability may be closer than comfort allows. In the midst of these tensions, Dr. Friday’s call to turn the corner rises like a steady light. It invites St. Vincent and the Grenadines to move forward with poise, clarity, and moral intelligence.

Friday’s New Democratic Party romped home to victory in the 2025 election by winning 14 of 15 seats. “The people have come out and said…’We want a better future for ourselves,’” Friday said as hundreds of people gathered in the capital, Kingstown, to support him, many blowing vuvuzelas in excitement.

Dr. Godwin Friday takes the oath as PM on Nov. 28, 2025.

RESONANCE

The resonance of the new prime minister’s message lies in its elegant simplicity. He must serve with the integrity that earned the nation’s trust. He must persuade doubters not by clever words but by consistent action. He must restore confidence in public leadership by improving the daily realities of citizens from Owia’s quiet shores to Canouan’s vibrant rhythms. His commitment to nurturing young thinkers, ethical dreamers, and future builders reflects a rare understanding of how small island states flourish.

Leadership renewal is not a luxury reserved for calmer seasons. It is the very architecture of national survival. With global institutions under strain and regional tensions rising, Dr. Friday’s attention to grooming new leaders reveals wisdom that sees beyond election cycles and into the long sweep of national destiny.

His leadership rises even higher through his humility. Dr. Friday does not cling to power. He recognizes that leadership is a trust, not a possession. He understands that a legacy is not crafted through long tenure but through the thoughtful preparation of others who will carry the nation forward with competence and conscience.

This approach resonates with the work of Dr. Isaac Newton whose global advisory efforts emphasize wisdom that listens, service that sacrifices, character that endures, and institution building that lives beyond the lifespan of any administration. When a leader invests in others, a nation becomes resilient. When a leader grips power tightly, a nation becomes brittle. Dr. Friday has chosen resilience.

This moment is therefore one of profound possibility for St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Turning the corner is not a catchy phrase. It is a call to collective elevation. It invites citizens to expect excellence and to join in the shared labor of national progress. It tells the Caribbean that amid global turbulence, a small nation guided by principled leadership can model justice, creativity, courage, and unity.

It reminds the world that humility paired with strategic clarity can carve out safe harbors even when the tides of history rise violently. If Dr. Friday continues with conviction shaped by compassion and purpose rooted in principle, the Vincentian story will not only advance. It will inspire. It will shine. It will set a new standard for what leadership in this era can mean.

Editor’s Note: Dr. Isaac Newton is a strategist and scholar trained at Harvard, Princeton, and Columbia. He advises governments and international institutions on governance, transformation, and global justice, helping nations and organizations turn vision into sustainable progress.

RELATED: St. Vincent And The Grenadines – Rethinking Power, Renewal And The Future Of Opposition

Nigeria Welcomes First Wave of St. Kitts and Nevis Delegation Following Landmark Visa-Free Agreement

News Americas, ABUJA, Nigeria, Nov. 26, 2025: Nigeria yesterday welcomed an official government delegation from St. Kitts and Nevis, just weeks after the two nations achieved a historic milestone: granting visa-free entry to citizens of St. Kitts and Nevis. The visit was facilitated in partnership with Aquarian Consult, underscoring the role of private sector leadership in advancing Afri-Caribbean Cooperation.

L-R: The Honourable Dr. Geoffrey Ian Hanley, Deputy Prime Minister, The Honourable Samal Mojah Duggins, Minister of Agriculture, The Honourable Lanien Blanchette, Speaker of the National Assembly Of St. Kitts and Nevis on arrival in Nigeria engage in a brief interview.

This groundbreaking agreement makes the Caribbean nation the first outside Africa and ECOWAS to enjoy unrestricted access to Nigeria, signalling a new era of connectivity and cooperation among the Global African people.

Led by Minister of Agriculture, Samal Mojah Duggins, the 20-member senior delegation also includes the Deputy Prime Minister, Dr. Geoffrey Ian Hanley, and Speaker of the National Assembly, Lanien Blanchette. With high-level government and private sector meetings on the agenda, the visit signals a bold commitment to accelerate diplomatic and economic ties after this landmark policy shift, an example of how Global African communities can unite for shared progress.

The breakthrough was brokered by Nigerian business leader, Aisha Maina, CEO of Aquarian Consult, whose leadership during the Afri-Caribbean Investment Summit (AACIS ’25) was instrumental in driving this agreement forward.

“This is more than a policy change, it’s a signal to the world that Africa and the Caribbean are ready to collaborate on trade, investment, and cultural exchange,” said Aisha Maina. “Global investors should take note: this is the beginning of a powerful alliance built on the strength of Global African people.”

The delegation’s arrival highlights opportunities in sectors such as agribusiness, technology, and creative industries. Both nations are advancing discussions on food security, cultural exchange, and youth empowerment, with expanded outcomes expected at AACIS ’26 in Abuja next March.

St. Kitts and Nevis Minister of Agriculture, Samal Mojah Duggins, said: “This partnership represents a bold step toward a future where Africa and the Caribbean collaborate as equals in trade, culture, and innovation, uniting global African efforts for shared prosperity.”

For global business leaders, this development signals new opportunities in South-South cooperation, leveraging Nigeria’s role as Africa’s economic gateway and St. Kitts and Nevis’ strategic Citizenship by Investment program.

Nigeria Welcomes First Wave of St. Kitts and Nevis Delegation Following Landmark Visa-Free Agreement

News Americas, ABUJA, Nigeria, Nov. 26, 2025: Nigeria yesterday welcomed an official government delegation from St. Kitts and Nevis, just weeks after the two nations achieved a historic milestone: granting visa-free entry to citizens of St. Kitts and Nevis. The visit was facilitated in partnership with Aquarian Consult, underscoring the role of private sector leadership in advancing Afri-Caribbean Cooperation.

L-R: The Honourable Dr. Geoffrey Ian Hanley, Deputy Prime Minister, The Honourable Samal Mojah Duggins, Minister of Agriculture, The Honourable Lanien Blanchette, Speaker of the National Assembly Of St. Kitts and Nevis on arrival in Nigeria engage in a brief interview.

This groundbreaking agreement makes the Caribbean nation the first outside Africa and ECOWAS to enjoy unrestricted access to Nigeria, signalling a new era of connectivity and cooperation among the Global African people.

Led by Minister of Agriculture, Samal Mojah Duggins, the 20-member senior delegation also includes the Deputy Prime Minister, Dr. Geoffrey Ian Hanley, and Speaker of the National Assembly, Lanien Blanchette. With high-level government and private sector meetings on the agenda, the visit signals a bold commitment to accelerate diplomatic and economic ties after this landmark policy shift, an example of how Global African communities can unite for shared progress.

The breakthrough was brokered by Nigerian business leader, Aisha Maina, CEO of Aquarian Consult, whose leadership during the Afri-Caribbean Investment Summit (AACIS ’25) was instrumental in driving this agreement forward.

“This is more than a policy change, it’s a signal to the world that Africa and the Caribbean are ready to collaborate on trade, investment, and cultural exchange,” said Aisha Maina. “Global investors should take note: this is the beginning of a powerful alliance built on the strength of Global African people.”

The delegation’s arrival highlights opportunities in sectors such as agribusiness, technology, and creative industries. Both nations are advancing discussions on food security, cultural exchange, and youth empowerment, with expanded outcomes expected at AACIS ’26 in Abuja next March.

St. Kitts and Nevis Minister of Agriculture, Samal Mojah Duggins, said: “This partnership represents a bold step toward a future where Africa and the Caribbean collaborate as equals in trade, culture, and innovation, uniting global African efforts for shared prosperity.”

For global business leaders, this development signals new opportunities in South-South cooperation, leveraging Nigeria’s role as Africa’s economic gateway and St. Kitts and Nevis’ strategic Citizenship by Investment program.

Will The Trump Administration Allow Temporary Protected Status For Jamaicans?

By NAN Staffwriter

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Tues. Nov. 18, 2025: New York Attorney General Letitia James is urging the Trump administration to grant Temporary Protected Status, (TPS), to Jamaicans following the catastrophic impact of Hurricane Melissa, which struck western Jamaica on October 28 and killed at least 45 people.

In a letter to the Department of Homeland Security, (DHS), James called for an immediate TPS designation to ensure Jamaicans already in the U.S. can safely live and work here while their homeland begins the long recovery.

A man walks with a shovel in hand over rubble on Main Street in Santa Cruz, St. Elizabeth, Jamaica on October 29, 2025. (Photo by RICARDO MAKYN/AFP via Getty Images)

“Hurricane Melissa has caused unimaginable damage… displacing tens of thousands of people and destroying vital infrastructure,” James said. “Forcing Jamaicans in the United States to return home to a devastated island would be dangerous and cruel. Situations like this are exactly what TPS was intended for.”

Melissa was the most intense storm to ever hit Jamaica, wiping out homes, schools, roads, businesses, and essential services. An estimated 30,000 households have been displaced, and many communities remain without electricity, clean water, or medical care. Early damage estimates exceed US$2 billion.

James noted that the U.S. has a long humanitarian precedent of granting TPS after major natural disasters. Honduras and Nicaragua received TPS after Hurricane Mitch in 1999. Haiti received TPS after the 2010 earthquake, and Nepal after its 2015 quake.

Elected officials representing New York’s Caribbean communities strongly backed the call.

Congresswoman Yvette Clarke, who recently led 43 members of Congress in a letter to DHS urging TPS for Jamaica, said the devastation demands a swift humanitarian response.

“Stopping the forceful expulsion of Jamaican nationals into dangerous, unsafe conditions… is a moral and diplomatic obligation,” Clarke said. “These are the precise moments for which Congress established TPS.”

Queens Borough President Donovan Richards Jr., the son of a Jamaican immigrant, said the scenes coming out of Jamaica “break my heart.”

“The Trump administration must immediately extend TPS to Jamaicans as they begin the arduous, painstaking work of rebuilding their lives,” Richards said.

Assemblymembers Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn, Brian Cunningham, and Alicia Hyndman also voiced support, noting the deep ties between Jamaica and New York and the unsafe conditions faced by returning nationals.

New York City Council Majority Whip Selvena N. Brooks-Powers said extending TPS is both a humanitarian duty and a reflection of America’s long-standing relationship with Jamaica.

“The devastation left behind by Hurricane Melissa is unimaginable,” she said. “Extending TPS is not only the right thing to do — it is a critical measure that honors our city’s deep ties to Jamaica.”

For now, the decision rests with the Trump administration. The question lingers: Will they act? The administration has so far ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 17 countries, front and center among them: Haiti, whose TPS will expire in February 3, 2026, short of the success of the current lawsuit against the termination. Other nations who have lost, or who risk losing, TPS in 2025, include Sudan, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, and Afghanistan.

ABOUT TPS

The Secretary of Homeland Security may designate a foreign country for TPS due to conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately. USCIS may grant TPS to eligible nationals of certain countries (or parts of countries), who are already in the United States. Eligible individuals without nationality who last resided in the designated country may also be granted TPS.

The Secretary may designate a country for TPS due to the following temporary conditions in the country:

Ongoing armed conflict (such as civil war)

An environmental disaster (such as earthquake or hurricane), or an epidemic

Other extraordinary and temporary conditions

During a designated period, individuals who are TPS beneficiaries or who are found preliminarily eligible for TPS upon initial review of their cases (prima facie eligible):

Are not removable from the United States

Can obtain an employment authorization document (EAD)

May be granted travel authorization

Once granted TPS, an individual also cannot be detained by DHS on the basis of his or her immigration status in the United States.

TPS is a temporary benefit that does not lead to lawful permanent resident status or give any other immigration status. However, registration for TPS does not prevent you from:

Applying for nonimmigrant status

Filing for adjustment of status based on an immigrant petition

Applying for any other immigration benefit or protection for which you may be eligible